Magnetic resonance imaging technologists are highly trained professionals responsible for acquiring medical images using sophisticated equipment. Their expertise lies in operating the MRI scanner, positioning patients correctly, and applying appropriate scanning protocols to generate high-quality diagnostic images. While technologists possess a deep understanding of the scanning process and image quality, their role typically does not extend to formal image interpretation or diagnosis. They can often recognize anatomical structures and potential anomalies within the images, but they are not qualified to make diagnostic pronouncements. For example, a technologist might notice a distinct difference in tissue density, but they would defer to a radiologist for a definitive diagnosis.
This distinction between image acquisition and interpretation is crucial for patient care. It ensures a system of checks and balances within the medical field, maximizing accuracy and mitigating potential biases. Radiologists possess specialized medical training focusing on diagnostic imaging interpretation, equipping them to analyze the complex data captured by MRI scans. This separation of duties ensures that the imaging process adheres to stringent quality standards and that diagnostic conclusions are reached by experts specifically trained for that purpose. Historically, the role of the imaging technologist has evolved alongside advancements in MRI technology. As the complexity of scanning procedures and image analysis has increased, so too has the specialized knowledge required of both technologists and radiologists.
This article will further explore the roles and responsibilities of MRI technologists, delve deeper into the diagnostic process led by radiologists, and examine the collaborative workflow crucial for delivering optimal patient care in medical imaging.
1. Technologist Acquires Images
The statement “Technologist acquires images” is central to understanding the role of an MRI technologist and addresses the question of whether they “know results.” While technologists are integral to the imaging process, their primary function is image acquisition, not interpretation. This distinction is crucial for clarifying the scope of their knowledge and responsibilities.
-
Technical Expertise and Image Acquisition
Technologists are skilled in operating MRI equipment, patient positioning, and applying appropriate scanning protocols. They calibrate the scanner, select parameters based on the requested study, and monitor the image acquisition process to ensure high-quality diagnostic images. For instance, a technologist might adjust the magnetic field strength or utilize specific pulse sequences to optimize visualization of a particular anatomical structure. While their technical expertise allows them to assess image quality, it doesn’t equate to diagnostic interpretation.
-
Observation vs. Interpretation
Technologists can observe anatomical structures and potential deviations from normal anatomy during the scanning process. They might notice a variation in tissue density or an unusual shape, but these observations are preliminary and require expert analysis. A technologist noticing an anomaly would flag it for the radiologist’s review, acknowledging the difference between observation and definitive diagnosis.
-
Collaboration with Radiologists
The workflow in medical imaging involves a crucial collaboration between technologists and radiologists. The technologist’s role in acquiring high-quality images directly impacts the radiologist’s ability to make an accurate diagnosis. For example, a poorly positioned patient or incorrect scanning parameters can lead to suboptimal images, potentially obscuring critical details. This interdependence highlights the importance of each professional’s specialized expertise.
-
Patient Care and Communication
While technologists cannot provide diagnostic information to patients, their interaction is vital for patient comfort and cooperation during the procedure. They explain the process, answer questions about the scan, and address any concerns, fostering a positive patient experience. This focus on patient care reinforces the technologist’s role as a vital part of the healthcare team, even though they do not deliver the final diagnosis.
In summary, the technologist’s acquisition of images forms the foundation for the diagnostic process. Their technical expertise and observational skills contribute significantly to patient care, but the definitive interpretation and diagnosis remain the purview of the radiologist. This delineation of roles ensures a robust and reliable diagnostic pathway.
2. Radiologist Interprets Images.
The statement “Radiologist interprets images” is pivotal in understanding why the question “does an MRI tech know results” requires nuanced clarification. It highlights the distinct roles within the medical imaging diagnostic process, emphasizing that image acquisition and interpretation are separate but interconnected functions. This separation ensures diagnostic accuracy and contributes to comprehensive patient care.
-
Specialized Training and Expertise
Radiologists undergo extensive medical training focused on diagnostic imaging interpretation. This specialized education equips them to analyze the complex data captured by MRI scans, differentiating between normal anatomical variations and potential pathologies. For example, a radiologist can distinguish subtle differences in tissue contrast that might indicate a benign cyst versus a malignant tumor, a distinction requiring years of specialized training. This expertise is essential for accurate diagnosis, forming the core difference between a technologist’s observations and a radiologist’s interpretation.
-
Diagnostic Process and Reporting
The radiologist’s interpretation transforms the raw image data acquired by the technologist into clinically meaningful information. They systematically analyze the images, correlate findings with patient history and clinical presentation, and generate a formal report detailing their diagnostic impressions. This report serves as a crucial communication tool for referring physicians, guiding treatment decisions and further investigations. For instance, a radiologist’s report might identify a specific type of fracture, informing the orthopedic surgeon’s surgical approach. This illustrates the radiologist’s role as the final arbiter of image interpretation.
-
Collaboration and Consultation
Effective communication between radiologists and referring clinicians is essential for optimal patient management. Radiologists often consult with other specialists to discuss complex cases, ensuring a multidisciplinary approach to diagnosis and treatment. For example, a radiologist might discuss findings with an oncologist to determine the stage of a cancerous tumor based on MRI imaging. This collaborative approach strengthens diagnostic accuracy and optimizes treatment strategies. It also highlights the importance of the radiologist’s expertise in guiding the broader medical team.
-
Quality Assurance and Continuous Learning
Radiologists participate in continuous professional development and quality assurance programs to maintain and enhance their interpretive skills. They stay abreast of the latest advancements in imaging technology and diagnostic criteria, ensuring they deliver the most accurate and up-to-date interpretations. For instance, radiologists regularly review challenging cases and participate in peer-review processes to refine their diagnostic accuracy. This commitment to ongoing learning underscores the dynamic nature of medical imaging and the radiologist’s dedication to maintaining the highest standards of practice.
In the context of “does an MRI tech know results,” these facets underscore the fundamental difference between observing and interpreting. While a technologist might recognize unusual features in an image, it is the radiologist’s expert interpretation that provides the definitive diagnosis. This distinction is paramount for accurate diagnosis, effective treatment planning, and ultimately, improved patient outcomes.
3. Technologist Observes, Not Diagnoses.
The statement “Technologist observes, not diagnoses” is central to addressing the query “does MRI tech know results.” It clarifies the crucial distinction between recognizing potential anomalies in medical images and formulating a formal diagnosis. While technologists possess anatomical knowledge and can identify unusual features during image acquisition, their observations do not constitute a diagnosis. This distinction safeguards diagnostic accuracy and ensures appropriate medical oversight.
-
Recognizing Anomalies, Not Making Diagnoses
Technologists are trained to operate MRI equipment and ensure image quality. During this process, they might observe variations in tissue density, unusual shapes, or other deviations from normal anatomy. For example, a technologist might notice a brighter area on a brain scan, but they would not conclude that it represents a tumor. This observation would be flagged for review by a radiologist, who has the expertise to make a definitive diagnosis. This distinction ensures that interpretations are made by qualified medical professionals.
-
Technical Proficiency vs. Medical Interpretation
Technologists possess technical proficiency in MRI procedures, understanding how different scanning parameters affect image quality. However, this technical expertise does not translate into the ability to interpret the medical significance of the images. For instance, a technologist can differentiate between a clear image and one affected by motion artifacts, but they cannot determine the clinical relevance of any observed abnormalities. This reinforces the separate but interconnected roles of technologists and radiologists in the diagnostic pathway.
-
Scope of Practice and Patient Safety
The distinction between observation and diagnosis is critical for maintaining clear boundaries within the medical field and safeguarding patient safety. Technologists play a vital role in acquiring high-quality images, but they are not qualified to provide diagnostic interpretations. Providing a diagnosis falls outside their scope of practice and could lead to misinterpretation or unnecessary anxiety for the patient. This delineation of responsibilities ensures that medical decisions are based on expert analysis and protects patients from potential misinformation.
-
Collaboration and Communication within the Healthcare Team
Effective communication between technologists and radiologists is crucial for accurate and timely diagnoses. Technologists communicate their observations to radiologists, providing valuable context that can aid in interpretation. For example, a technologist might note that a patient moved during the scan, which could explain blurring or artifacts in the images. This communication enhances the diagnostic process, ensuring that radiologists have all the necessary information to make informed decisions. This collaborative approach optimizes the workflow and contributes to better patient outcomes.
In the context of “does an MRI tech know results,” understanding that a technologist observes but does not diagnose clarifies the limitations of their knowledge. While they contribute significantly to the imaging process, the definitive interpretation and communication of results remain the responsibility of the radiologist. This distinction ensures a rigorous and reliable diagnostic process, ultimately benefiting patient care.
4. Formal Diagnosis from Radiologist
The statement “Formal diagnosis from radiologist” directly addresses the core of “does MRI tech know results.” It clarifies the definitive nature of the radiologist’s role in the diagnostic process, emphasizing that the radiologist, not the technologist, provides the official interpretation of medical images. This distinction is fundamental to understanding the workflow in medical imaging and ensuring accurate patient care.
-
Medical Expertise and Diagnostic Interpretation
Radiologists possess specialized medical training that equips them to interpret the complex data generated by MRI scans. This expertise allows them to differentiate between normal anatomical variations and pathological findings, a critical distinction beyond the scope of an MRI technologist’s training. For example, while a technologist might notice an area of increased signal intensity on a brain scan, the radiologist possesses the knowledge to determine whether it represents a benign cyst, a demyelinating lesion, or a more serious condition like a tumor. This specialized interpretation is crucial for accurate diagnosis and subsequent treatment planning.
-
Formal Reporting and Communication of Results
The formal diagnosis provided by the radiologist is documented in a written report. This report serves as the official communication of the imaging findings to the referring physician. It includes a detailed description of the observed findings, diagnostic impressions, and often recommendations for further investigation or management. For instance, a radiologist’s report might describe the size and location of a suspected tumor, suggest a biopsy for tissue diagnosis, and recommend consultation with an oncologist. This formalized process ensures clear communication and facilitates appropriate patient care.
-
Medico-legal Responsibility and Accountability
The radiologist bears the medico-legal responsibility for the accuracy and completeness of the diagnostic report. Their interpretation forms the basis for clinical decision-making and subsequent patient management. For example, if a radiologist overlooks a subtle fracture on an MRI of the spine, it could have significant implications for the patient’s treatment and prognosis. This accountability underscores the importance of the radiologist’s specialized training and expertise in the diagnostic process. It also highlights the limitations of the technologist’s role, who, while essential to acquiring the images, does not bear the same medico-legal responsibility for their interpretation.
-
Integration of Clinical Information and Diagnostic Context
Radiologists consider the patient’s clinical history, symptoms, and other relevant medical information when interpreting MRI scans. This contextualization is essential for arriving at an accurate diagnosis. For instance, a radiologist might interpret an MRI of the knee differently depending on whether the patient reports a recent injury, has a history of arthritis, or experiences chronic pain. This integration of clinical information ensures that the diagnostic interpretation is not made in isolation but within the broader context of the patient’s health status. It also further distinguishes the radiologist’s role from that of the technologist, who primarily focuses on the technical aspects of image acquisition.
In conclusion, the principle of “Formal diagnosis from radiologist” definitively answers the question “does MRI tech know results.” While technologists contribute valuable observations, they do not provide official interpretations. The radiologists specialized training, formal reporting process, medico-legal responsibility, and integration of clinical information underscore their unique and essential role in the diagnostic pathway. This clear delineation of roles ensures accurate diagnoses, facilitates effective communication within the healthcare team, and ultimately contributes to optimal patient care.
5. Technologist Understands Anatomy.
A technologist’s understanding of anatomy is integral to the medical imaging process, yet it does not equate to knowing diagnostic results. While anatomical knowledge informs their technical work, it’s crucial to differentiate between recognizing anatomical structures and interpreting their clinical significance in the context of “does MRI tech know results.” This distinction clarifies the technologist’s role and emphasizes the specialized expertise of the radiologist in providing diagnoses.
-
Anatomical Localization and Image Acquisition
Technologists use their anatomical knowledge to position patients correctly and select appropriate scanning parameters. Understanding the location and orientation of organs, bones, and tissues allows them to acquire targeted images that optimize the visualization of specific anatomical structures. For example, a technologist needs to know the precise location of the pancreas to acquire images that adequately visualize it. While this anatomical knowledge is essential for high-quality imaging, it does not enable them to interpret the images for potential pathologies.
-
Recognition of Anatomical Structures vs. Pathology
Technologists can identify normal anatomical structures on MRI images. This recognition allows them to distinguish between expected anatomical variations and potential deviations, which they can flag for the radiologist’s review. For instance, a technologist can identify the different lobes of the liver, but they cannot diagnose liver disease based on image characteristics. This distinction underscores the difference between anatomical knowledge and diagnostic interpretation.
-
Communication with Radiologists and Clinical Context
A technologist’s anatomical knowledge facilitates communication with radiologists. They can use anatomical terminology to describe their observations, providing valuable context for the radiologist’s interpretation. For example, a technologist might note an unusual signal intensity within the hippocampus, enabling the radiologist to focus their analysis on that specific region. This communication enhances the diagnostic process but does not imply that the technologist can provide a diagnosis.
-
Limitations of Anatomical Knowledge in Diagnosis
While crucial for image acquisition and communication, anatomical knowledge alone does not qualify a technologist to interpret the clinical significance of MRI findings. Diagnosing pathologies requires medical training and an understanding of disease processes, which falls within the radiologist’s purview. For instance, identifying a mass in the lung on an MRI scan requires anatomical knowledge, but determining whether it is benign, malignant, or related to another condition requires medical expertise beyond the scope of a technologist.
In summary, while “Technologist understands anatomy” is a critical component of their skillset, it does not answer the question “does MRI tech know results” affirmatively. Anatomical knowledge informs their technical work but does not replace the specialized medical expertise required for diagnostic interpretation. This distinction reinforces the separate but interconnected roles of technologists and radiologists in delivering comprehensive patient care.
6. Technologist Recognizes Anomalies.
The ability of a technologist to recognize anomalies is a crucial component of the medical imaging process, but it does not equate to “knowing results” in the diagnostic sense. While a skilled technologist can identify deviations from normal anatomy during image acquisition, this observation is distinct from a formal diagnosis. The recognition of an anomaly serves as a trigger for further investigation and expert interpretation by a radiologist. For example, a technologist might observe an unusual shape or density in a brain scan. This observation, while important, does not define the nature of the anomalywhether it is a benign cyst, a vascular malformation, or something more serious. This distinction is crucial for understanding the limitations of the technologist’s role in answering the question “does MRI tech know results.”
The importance of a technologist recognizing anomalies lies in their ability to facilitate a timely and accurate diagnosis. By identifying potential areas of concern, they direct the radiologist’s attention to specific regions or features within the images. This can expedite the diagnostic process and ensure that subtle findings are not overlooked. For instance, a technologist noticing an asymmetry in breast tissue density might prompt the radiologist to perform a more detailed analysis of that area, potentially leading to the early detection of breast cancer. The technologist’s observation, therefore, acts as a critical first step, but the diagnostic conclusion remains the purview of the radiologist.
In summary, “Technologist recognizes anomalies” contributes significantly to the overall diagnostic workflow, but it represents only one piece of the puzzle. While this skill is essential for identifying potential problems, it does not provide a definitive answer to “does MRI tech know results.” The recognition of an anomaly is a trigger for further investigation, expert interpretation, and ultimately, a formal diagnosis by a qualified radiologist. This nuanced understanding of the different roles and responsibilities within medical imaging is critical for ensuring accurate diagnoses, appropriate patient care, and a robust, reliable diagnostic pathway.
7. Communication is crucial.
Effective communication plays a vital role in addressing the complexities inherent in the question “does MRI tech know results.” While the technologist does not provide diagnostic interpretations, their observations and communication with the radiologist are essential for accurate and efficient diagnosis. This communication bridge connects the technical expertise of image acquisition with the medical expertise of image interpretation. A breakdown in communication can have significant consequences, potentially delaying diagnosis or leading to misinterpretations. For example, if a technologist notices an unusual shadow near a patient’s lung but fails to communicate this observation clearly to the radiologist, it could delay the diagnosis of a potentially serious condition. Conversely, clear and precise communication regarding the patient’s positioning, any difficulties encountered during the scan, or observations about image quality can significantly aid the radiologist’s interpretative process.
The practical significance of this understanding lies in optimizing the diagnostic workflow and minimizing potential errors. Clear communication ensures that relevant information is effectively transmitted between the technologist and the radiologist, contributing to a more comprehensive understanding of the imaging findings. This includes not only observations about potential anomalies but also technical details that might affect image quality. For example, if a patient moved slightly during the scan, creating motion artifacts, the technologist communicating this to the radiologist prevents misinterpretation of these artifacts as pathological findings. Such communication fosters a collaborative environment where both the technologist’s technical expertise and the radiologist’s medical knowledge are effectively leveraged to achieve the most accurate diagnosis.
In summary, while an MRI technologist does not provide formal diagnostic results, communication remains crucial for connecting their technical observations with the radiologist’s diagnostic interpretation. This communication forms an essential link in the diagnostic chain, ensuring that all relevant information informs the final diagnosis. Robust communication protocols and a collaborative environment between technologists and radiologists are, therefore, indispensable for optimizing diagnostic accuracy and delivering high-quality patient care. Challenges in establishing or maintaining these communication pathways can directly impact the effectiveness and reliability of the diagnostic process, emphasizing the critical role of clear and concise communication within the medical imaging field.
8. Patient care is paramount.
The principle of “Patient care is paramount” lies at the heart of the discussion surrounding “does MRI tech know results.” While seemingly separate concepts, they are intrinsically linked. Understanding this connection is crucial for optimizing the diagnostic process and ensuring patients receive the best possible care. The technologist’s role, while not encompassing formal diagnosis, significantly impacts patient care. Their expertise in patient positioning, scan protocol selection, and image acquisition directly affects the quality of diagnostic images, which in turn influences the radiologist’s ability to make an accurate diagnosis. For instance, a poorly positioned patient can result in suboptimal images, potentially obscuring critical details and hindering the diagnostic process. Conversely, a skilled technologist’s ability to acquire high-quality images facilitates a more accurate and timely diagnosis, ultimately benefiting the patient. Furthermore, the technologist’s interaction with the patient during the procedure directly impacts their experience. A compassionate and informative approach can alleviate anxiety, foster cooperation, and ensure a more comfortable experience, even within the confines of a technologically complex environment.
The practical significance of this understanding lies in recognizing that every member of the healthcare team, including the MRI technologist, plays a vital role in patient care. While the formal diagnosis comes from the radiologist, the technologist’s actions directly influence the quality and efficiency of the diagnostic process. This underscores the importance of a collaborative and communicative environment within the medical imaging department. Open communication between technologists and radiologists regarding image quality, potential anomalies, or any patient-specific factors ensures that all relevant information is considered in the final interpretation. For example, a technologist noticing a patient’s discomfort or difficulty holding still during a scan can provide valuable context to the radiologist, potentially explaining image artifacts or influencing the need for additional imaging. This collaborative approach ensures that patient well-being is central to every stage of the diagnostic process.
In conclusion, “Patient care is paramount” serves as a guiding principle that shapes the entire medical imaging process, including the specific question of “does MRI tech know results.” While the technologist does not provide the formal diagnosis, their actions, from image acquisition to patient interaction, have a profound impact on patient care. Recognizing this interconnectedness emphasizes the importance of a collaborative, patient-centered approach within medical imaging, ultimately leading to more accurate diagnoses, improved patient experiences, and better overall outcomes. Challenges in maintaining a patient-focused approach can arise from time constraints, staffing shortages, or communication barriers within the healthcare team. Addressing these challenges through process optimization, continuous training, and fostering a culture of open communication are crucial for upholding the principle of patient-centered care within the complex and technologically advanced field of medical imaging.
Frequently Asked Questions
This FAQ section addresses common queries regarding the role of MRI technologists and their knowledge of scan results. Clarity on these points helps to demystify the medical imaging process and emphasizes the importance of collaboration between technologists and radiologists.
Question 1: Do MRI technologists interpret scans and provide diagnoses?
No, MRI technologists are highly skilled in acquiring images but do not interpret them diagnostically. Their expertise lies in operating the MRI scanner, ensuring patient safety, and optimizing image quality. Diagnostic interpretation is the exclusive purview of radiologists.
Question 2: Can MRI technologists identify potential abnormalities on scans?
Technologists possess anatomical knowledge and can recognize deviations from normal anatomy. However, these observations are not diagnostic conclusions. They serve as flags for the radiologist, who performs the formal interpretation.
Question 3: Why don’t MRI technologists provide results directly to patients?
Providing diagnostic interpretations falls outside the scope of an MRI technologist’s training and licensure. Directly providing results could lead to misinterpretations and compromise patient care. Formal results are communicated by the referring physician, based on the radiologist’s report.
Question 4: How do MRI technologists contribute to the diagnostic process?
Technologists play a crucial role by acquiring high-quality diagnostic images, which form the basis of the radiologist’s interpretation. Their technical expertise and observations regarding image quality and potential anomalies significantly contribute to the diagnostic workflow.
Question 5: What is the importance of communication between technologists and radiologists?
Effective communication is essential for accurate and efficient diagnoses. Technologists communicate technical observations and potential anomalies to radiologists, providing valuable context that informs the final interpretation.
Question 6: How does the distinction between technologist and radiologist roles benefit patients?
This separation of duties ensures a system of checks and balances, maximizing diagnostic accuracy and minimizing potential errors. It guarantees that image acquisition and interpretation are performed by professionals with specialized expertise, optimizing patient safety and care.
Understanding the distinct roles of MRI technologists and radiologists is fundamental to navigating the medical imaging landscape. This collaborative workflow ensures that patients benefit from both technical proficiency in image acquisition and expert medical interpretation, ultimately leading to more accurate diagnoses and improved patient care.
This concludes the FAQ section. The following section will delve further into the collaborative relationship between technologists and radiologists in optimizing the patient experience within medical imaging.
Tips for Navigating the Medical Imaging Process
Understanding the roles within medical imaging, specifically regarding who provides diagnostic interpretations, empowers patients to navigate the process more effectively. These tips offer practical guidance for individuals undergoing MRI scans and emphasize the importance of clear communication with healthcare providers.
Tip 1: Direct questions regarding diagnosis to the referring physician. While technologists can provide information about the scanning procedure, diagnostic interpretations should be sought from the referring physician, who receives and interprets the radiologist’s report.
Tip 2: Communicate openly with the technologist about the procedure. Sharing any concerns or anxieties about the MRI scan with the technologist can alleviate discomfort and ensure a smoother experience. Technologists can address procedural questions and provide reassurance.
Tip 3: Inquire about the timeline for receiving results. Understanding the typical timeframe for receiving scan results helps manage expectations and reduces anxiety. The technologist can often provide an estimated timeframe, but the referring physician is responsible for communicating the official results.
Tip 4: Clarify any uncertainties about the radiologist’s report with the referring physician. The radiologist’s report can contain complex medical terminology. Patients should not hesitate to discuss any unclear points with their referring physician for a comprehensive understanding of the findings.
Tip 5: Recognize the distinct roles of technologists and radiologists. Technologists excel in image acquisition, while radiologists specialize in interpretation. Understanding these separate but complementary roles clarifies the diagnostic pathway and ensures that questions are directed to the appropriate professional.
Tip 6: Focus on clear and concise communication with all healthcare providers. Providing accurate and complete information about medical history, symptoms, and any concerns ensures that the diagnostic process is as thorough and effective as possible.
Following these tips empowers patients to engage actively in their healthcare journey. Open communication, a clear understanding of roles within the medical imaging team, and realistic expectations regarding results contribute to a more positive and informed patient experience.
The subsequent conclusion will synthesize the key themes discussed throughout this article and offer final perspectives on the collaborative relationship between technologists, radiologists, and patients in the pursuit of accurate diagnoses and optimal patient care.
Does an MRI Tech Know Results
This exploration of the question “does an MRI tech know results” has clarified the distinct roles within the medical imaging process. While magnetic resonance imaging technologists possess crucial anatomical knowledge and technical expertise in image acquisition, their observations do not constitute formal diagnoses. The ability to recognize potential anomalies during scanning is a valuable skill that contributes to the diagnostic workflow, but the definitive interpretation of medical images remains the exclusive purview of radiologists. Radiologists undergo specialized medical training that equips them to analyze complex image data, integrate clinical information, and provide formal diagnostic reports. Effective communication between technologists and radiologists forms a critical bridge, ensuring that technical observations and diagnostic expertise converge to achieve accurate and timely results. This collaborative approach optimizes the diagnostic pathway and ensures that patients benefit from both technical proficiency and medical expertise.
The distinction between observation and interpretation in medical imaging underscores the importance of specialized roles within the healthcare system. Maintaining this distinction safeguards diagnostic accuracy, promotes patient safety, and ensures a robust and reliable diagnostic process. Continued advancements in imaging technology and ongoing professional development for both technologists and radiologists will further refine the diagnostic process, ultimately leading to improved patient outcomes and a more comprehensive understanding of human health. A deeper public understanding of these roles promotes informed patient engagement and fosters realistic expectations regarding the communication and interpretation of medical imaging results.
