This information pertains to the outcome of a specific annual road race held in Cape Elizabeth, Maine, covering a distance of 10 kilometers. Data typically includes finishing times for each participant, categorized by gender and age group, often accompanied by details like overall placement and pace. Example data might show the winner’s time, the average finishing time, or the number of finishers.
Access to this data provides runners with performance benchmarks, allowing for self-assessment, goal setting, and tracking progress over time. It also offers spectators and the broader running community insights into competitive standards and individual achievements within the race. The event’s history and growth are reflected in these accumulated results, contributing to its ongoing narrative and prestige within the running world.
Further exploration could involve analyzing trends in finishing times, examining the demographics of participants, or delving into the stories of exceptional performances. The specific focus of any subsequent analysis will shape the relevant data subsets and inform the interpretation of the overall race outcome.
1. Winning Times
Winning times represent a crucial component of Beach to Beacon 10k results, serving as a benchmark for elite performance and a reflection of the race’s competitive landscape. These times capture the pinnacle of achievement in each race edition, demonstrating the speed and endurance of top athletes. Examining winning times over the years reveals trends in performance improvement, the impact of varying race conditions, and the evolution of competitive standards within the sport. For instance, a new course record signifies exceptional performance and potentially favorable conditions, while a slower winning time might indicate challenging weather or a particularly competitive field. The 2011 men’s winning time of 27:28, set by Gilbert Okari, stands as a testament to exceptional speed and endurance.
Analysis of winning times provides valuable insights for both runners and race organizers. Runners can gauge their own performance against the best in the field, setting aspirational goals and identifying areas for improvement. Race organizers can track the caliber of competition over time, assess the impact of course changes or weather conditions, and promote the event by highlighting exceptional performances. Furthermore, winning times contribute to the historical narrative of the race, showcasing the achievements of past champions and adding to the event’s prestige. Comparing winning times across different demographics, such as male and female categories, offers further insights into performance disparities and overall participation trends.
Understanding the significance of winning times within the broader context of Beach to Beacon 10k results provides a deeper appreciation for the race’s competitive nature and the dedication of its participants. This analysis contributes to a more comprehensive understanding of race dynamics, individual achievements, and the ongoing evolution of the event. Further exploration could involve comparing winning times to average finishing times, examining the relationship between winning times and participant demographics, or analyzing the impact of specific training regimens on achieving elite-level performance. These investigations enhance understanding of performance within the sport of long-distance running.
2. Age group rankings
Age group rankings constitute a crucial element within Beach to Beacon 10k results, providing a nuanced perspective on individual performance relative to peers. These rankings categorize participants based on specific age ranges, allowing for comparisons within more homogenous groups. This segmentation acknowledges the impact of age on physical capabilities and offers a fairer assessment of achievement than overall rankings alone. For example, a runner in the 40-44 age group might not compete for an overall top placement but could achieve a high ranking within their specific age category. This recognition of relative performance encourages broader participation and fosters a sense of accomplishment across different demographics.
The practical significance of age group rankings extends beyond individual motivation. Race organizers utilize this data to understand participation patterns across age demographics, tailor award categories, and recognize achievements within specific age groups. This data also allows for the analysis of performance trends within each age group over time, providing insights into the evolution of competitive standards and the overall demographics of the race. For instance, an increase in participation within a specific age group might reflect growing interest in running within that demographic, while consistent top performances within another age group could highlight the success of specific training programs targeting that age range.
In conclusion, age group rankings provide a critical layer of detail within Beach to Beacon 10k results, moving beyond absolute performance to offer a relative measure of achievement within specific age categories. This fosters inclusivity, encourages participation from diverse age groups, and facilitates a more granular understanding of race dynamics and performance trends. Challenges might include defining appropriate age brackets to ensure fair competition and addressing potential disparities in participation across different age groups. However, the benefits of age group rankings contribute significantly to the overall value and meaningfulness of the race results, promoting both individual achievement and a broader understanding of running performance across different age demographics.
3. Overall placements
Overall placements within Beach to Beacon 10k results provide a comprehensive ranking of all participants, irrespective of age or gender. This ranking system offers a straightforward view of individual performance relative to the entire field, highlighting the fastest runners across all demographics. Analyzing overall placements reveals the top competitors and provides a general overview of the race’s competitive landscape. This information serves as a valuable point of reference for participants, spectators, and analysts alike.
-
Elite Performance Benchmark
Overall placements showcase the achievements of elite runners. Top finishers often represent professional or highly competitive amateur athletes. Examining their performance provides insights into training strategies, pacing, and competitive tactics. For example, a consistent top 10 finisher over multiple years demonstrates sustained excellence and dedication to the sport. This data allows aspiring runners to benchmark their performance against the best in the field.
-
General Field Assessment
Beyond the elite runners, overall placements offer a broader view of the participant field. Analyzing the distribution of finishing times across all participants provides insights into the general level of competitiveness within the race. A large cluster of similar finishing times might indicate a highly competitive field, while a wider distribution could suggest a mix of experience levels among participants. This information is valuable for race organizers in understanding the overall profile of the race and tailoring future events.
-
Personal Performance Tracking
While age group rankings provide a relative performance measure within specific demographics, overall placements offer a broader perspective on individual progress. Runners can track their overall placement year over year to assess their improvement and set realistic goals. For example, a runner consistently improving their overall placement demonstrates progress irrespective of age or other demographic factors. This provides a clear and motivating metric for personal development.
-
Context for Age and Gender Rankings
Overall placements provide essential context for interpreting age and gender-specific rankings. Understanding how a top performer within a specific age group ranks overall provides a more complete picture of their achievement. For instance, an individual winning their age group but placing outside the top 100 overall highlights the depth of the field and the competitiveness within other age groups. This nuanced perspective enriches the understanding of performance across different demographics.
In summary, analyzing overall placements provides a valuable perspective on Beach to Beacon 10k results, complementing age and gender-based rankings to offer a comprehensive understanding of individual and overall race performance. This multifaceted analysis fosters a more complete appreciation for the achievements of all participants, from elite runners to those striving for personal bests, and contributes to the ongoing narrative of the event.
4. Gender breakdowns
Gender breakdowns within Beach to Beacon 10k results offer crucial insights into participation and performance disparities between male and female runners. Analyzing results by gender reveals trends in female participation rates, performance gaps between genders, and the evolution of competitive standards within each gender category. This data serves as a valuable tool for understanding the broader landscape of competitive running and promoting equitable participation. For example, tracking the number of female finishers over time reflects the growth and development of women’s running, while analyzing the difference in average finishing times between genders provides insights into physiological differences and training approaches.
The practical significance of gender breakdowns extends beyond simply documenting participation rates. Race organizers can use this data to tailor outreach programs, encourage greater female participation, and design appropriate award categories. Furthermore, analyzing performance trends within each gender category allows for the identification of potential barriers to female participation and the development of strategies to promote gender equity within the sport. For instance, if the data reveals a significant performance gap between genders, this could prompt research into training disparities or physiological factors influencing performance. The 2023 results, with a female winning time of 30:58 (Keira D’Amato) and a male winning time of 27:37 (Addisu Yihune), offer a concrete example of this performance differential.
In conclusion, gender breakdowns within Beach to Beacon 10k results provide a critical lens for understanding participation and performance trends. This data is essential for promoting equitable opportunities in competitive running, identifying areas for improvement, and celebrating the achievements of female athletes. Challenges might include ensuring accurate data collection and addressing potential biases in reporting or analysis. However, continued analysis of gender-specific results remains crucial for fostering a more inclusive and representative running community, driving progress towards greater gender parity within the sport, and enriching the overall understanding of performance dynamics within the Beach to Beacon 10k.
5. Pace analysis
Pace analysis plays a critical role in understanding Beach to Beacon 10k results, providing insights beyond mere finishing times. Examining pace allows for a deeper understanding of race strategies, performance consistency, and the physiological demands of the course. Runners often aim for even splits, maintaining a consistent pace throughout the race. However, variations in pace can reflect strategic decisions, course terrain challenges, or individual runner strengths and weaknesses. A runner might choose a negative split, running the second half faster than the first, indicating a strategic approach to energy conservation and a strong finish. Conversely, a positive split, where the second half is slower, might suggest fatigue or difficulty navigating specific sections of the course.
The practical application of pace analysis extends to both individual runners and coaches. Runners can analyze their own pace data to identify areas for improvement, optimize training strategies, and refine race tactics. For instance, identifying consistent slowing in the later stages of a race might indicate a need for improved endurance training. Coaches can leverage pace analysis to tailor training programs, personalize pacing strategies for individual athletes, and evaluate the effectiveness of different training methodologies. Examining the pace of elite runners provides valuable insights into optimal race strategies and the physiological demands of high-level competition. For example, analyzing the 2019 winning performance might reveal how a consistent pace contributed to a course record. Conversely, examining a slower winning time in another year might highlight the impact of varying weather conditions or a more challenging field, reflected in fluctuating pace throughout the race.
In summary, pace analysis adds a crucial layer of depth to the interpretation of Beach to Beacon 10k results. By examining variations in pace, runners, coaches, and analysts gain a deeper understanding of race dynamics, individual performance, and the impact of both physiological and strategic factors on race outcomes. Challenges in pace analysis include accurately capturing and interpreting data, accounting for variations in course terrain and weather conditions, and integrating pace data with other performance metrics. However, the insights gained through pace analysis are essential for optimizing performance, refining training strategies, and achieving peak results in competitive running.
6. Year-over-year trends
Year-over-year trends in Beach to Beacon 10k results offer valuable insights into the race’s evolution, reflecting changes in participation demographics, competitive standards, and the impact of external factors like weather conditions. Analyzing these trends reveals long-term patterns, providing context for interpreting individual race outcomes and informing future race planning. For example, a consistent increase in finishing times over several years could suggest increasingly challenging weather patterns, while a growth in overall participation might reflect increasing popularity of the race or broader trends in long-distance running participation. The growth in female participation from 2,487 in 2002 to 4,095 in 2023 demonstrates this tangible growth within a specific demographic. Examining winning times over several years reveals the impact of elite athlete participation and evolving competitive standards. The record-setting 27:28 male winning time in 2011, compared to a slower 28:35 in 2005, showcases this performance fluctuation.
Practical applications of analyzing year-over-year trends include informing race organizers’ decisions regarding course management, resource allocation, and marketing strategies. Identifying declining participation within specific age groups could prompt targeted outreach programs. Consistent increases in finishing times might necessitate course adjustments or strategies for mitigating the effects of adverse weather conditions. Analyzing trends also helps sponsors understand the race’s reach and demographic profile, informing investment decisions and maximizing marketing effectiveness. Furthermore, understanding long-term trends provides valuable context for media coverage, enabling more insightful commentary and historical perspectives on race development.
In summary, analyzing year-over-year trends provides a crucial longitudinal perspective on Beach to Beacon 10k results. This analysis allows for a deeper understanding of the race’s evolution, informs strategic planning for future races, and enhances the overall understanding of participation and performance within the sport of long-distance running. Challenges include ensuring data consistency across years, accounting for changes in race conditions, and interpreting complex interactions between multiple contributing factors. However, the insights derived from trend analysis are essential for promoting sustained race growth, enhancing participant experience, and fostering a deeper understanding of the dynamics within competitive running.
7. Participant Demographics
Participant demographics are integral to understanding Beach to Beacon 10k results, providing crucial context for interpreting performance data and shaping the race’s overall narrative. Analysis of demographic data, encompassing age, gender, geographic location, and running experience, reveals patterns in participation, identifies trends within specific demographic groups, and informs strategies for promoting broader inclusivity. For instance, a high concentration of participants from a particular region might reflect strong local running communities or targeted outreach efforts. A significant disparity in age group representation could indicate a need for programs promoting youth or senior participation. The increasing number of female participants over the years demonstrates a positive trend toward greater gender balance within the race. Examining the distribution of runners based on experience levels, from first-time 10k runners to seasoned marathoners, provides insights into the race’s appeal to diverse running communities.
Understanding participant demographics offers practical benefits for various stakeholders. Race organizers can use demographic data to tailor marketing campaigns, target specific demographics for increased participation, and allocate resources effectively. Analyzing performance data within specific demographic groups allows for identifying disparities and implementing targeted training programs or outreach initiatives. Sponsors can leverage demographic insights to understand the race audience, maximizing the impact of their investments. Researchers can use demographic data to study participation trends in long-distance running, explore correlations between demographics and performance, and contribute to a broader understanding of health and fitness within different populations. For example, studying the performance of different age groups over time could contribute to understanding the impact of aging on athletic performance.
In conclusion, analysis of participant demographics enriches the understanding of Beach to Beacon 10k results, moving beyond raw performance data to provide a more nuanced and contextualized interpretation. This data is essential for fostering inclusivity, promoting equitable participation, and informing strategic decision-making for race organizers, sponsors, and researchers. Challenges include ensuring accurate and comprehensive data collection, addressing potential biases in data analysis, and protecting participant privacy. However, the insights gained from demographic analysis contribute significantly to the ongoing development and sustainability of the Beach to Beacon 10k and enhance the overall understanding of participation and performance within the broader context of long-distance running.
Frequently Asked Questions about Beach to Beacon 10k Results
This section addresses common inquiries regarding race results, providing clarity and facilitating a deeper understanding of the data.
Question 1: How quickly are official results posted after the race concludes?
Official results are typically available within a few hours of the race’s conclusion, posted online through the official Beach to Beacon website and partner timing platforms.
Question 2: What information is included in the race results?
Race results typically include runner names, bib numbers, finishing times, overall placement, gender and age group rankings, and pace information.
Question 3: How are age group rankings determined?
Age group rankings categorize participants based on pre-assigned age brackets, allowing for comparison and recognition of achievement within specific age demographics.
Question 4: Can historical race results be accessed?
Yes, historical race results from previous years are generally available on the official Beach to Beacon website, often archived by year.
Question 5: How are discrepancies or corrections to race results handled?
Individuals seeking to report discrepancies or request corrections should contact the race organizers directly through the official contact channels provided on the website.
Question 6: How can race results data be used for performance analysis?
Race results data can be utilized for various performance analyses, including tracking personal progress, comparing results across different years, analyzing pacing strategies, and understanding overall race trends.
Understanding these aspects of Beach to Beacon 10k results ensures accurate interpretation and facilitates informed decision-making for runners, coaches, and analysts.
Further exploration of specific aspects of the race results can provide deeper insights into individual performance and overall race dynamics.
Tips for Utilizing Beach to Beacon 10k Results
Examining race results data offers valuable insights for runners seeking to improve performance and understand competitive dynamics. The following tips provide guidance on effectively utilizing this information.
Tip 1: Track Personal Progress: Utilize historical race data to monitor individual performance trends over time. Compare finishing times, overall placement, and age group rankings across multiple years to assess improvement and identify areas for continued growth.
Tip 2: Analyze Pace Data: Examine pace information to understand race strategies and identify areas for optimization. Evaluate splits, identify consistent slowing or acceleration patterns, and experiment with different pacing strategies during training runs to refine race-day tactics.
Tip 3: Benchmark Against Competition: Compare individual performance against age group rankings and overall placements to understand relative standing within the field. Identify top performers within specific age groups and analyze their race data for insights into successful strategies.
Tip 4: Study Course Dynamics: Use results data in conjunction with course maps and elevation profiles to understand how course terrain influences performance. Identify challenging sections and develop strategies for navigating these areas effectively.
Tip 5: Consider Weather Conditions: Analyze historical race results in conjunction with weather data to understand the impact of temperature, humidity, and wind on performance. Factor weather conditions into training plans and race-day strategies.
Tip 6: Learn from Elite Runners: Examine the performance data of elite runners, focusing on their pacing strategies, overall placement, and finishing times. Identify commonalities among top performers and consider how these strategies might be adapted for individual training plans.
Tip 7: Set Realistic Goals: Utilize race results data to establish achievable performance goals based on previous results and identified areas for improvement. Set SMART goalsSpecific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant, and Time-boundto maximize motivation and track progress effectively.
By applying these tips, runners can gain valuable insights from race results data, leading to improved performance, more effective training, and a deeper understanding of competitive running dynamics. This analytical approach fosters continuous improvement and contributes to a more strategic and fulfilling running experience.
These insights culminate in a more comprehensive understanding of individual performance and the competitive landscape of the Beach to Beacon 10k.
Beach to Beacon 10k Results
Exploration of Beach to Beacon 10k results reveals a multifaceted dataset offering valuable insights into individual performance, race dynamics, and broader trends within the sport of long-distance running. Analysis of winning times, age group rankings, overall placements, gender breakdowns, pace variations, year-over-year trends, and participant demographics provides a comprehensive understanding of the race’s competitive landscape and its evolution over time. These data points offer crucial context for evaluating individual achievements, informing training strategies, and promoting broader participation within the running community.
The data’s potential extends beyond individual analysis, informing race organizers, sponsors, and researchers. Continued examination of Beach to Beacon 10k results promises deeper understanding of performance dynamics, contributing to more effective training programs, enhanced race management strategies, and a more inclusive and engaging experience for all participants. This ongoing analysis strengthens the race’s legacy and fosters a more data-driven approach to competitive running.
