The outcomes of the American Wrestling Association (AWA) events held in January 1984 represent a specific point in the organization’s history. This period showcased established stars and emerging talent, contributing to storylines that shaped the AWA landscape. Matches and their consequences during this month likely influenced rankings, championship pursuits, and ongoing rivalries.
Understanding the events of this timeframe provides valuable context for the broader narrative of professional wrestling in the mid-1980s. The AWA, a prominent wrestling organization at the time, played a significant role in the industry. Examining the results from January 1984 offers insight into the AWA’s competitive landscape, its key performers, and the evolving dynamics of the sport. This period may also mark a turning point or highlight significant shifts in the AWA’s trajectory.
This exploration will delve into specific matches, notable performers, and the impact of these January 1984 events on the AWA. Further analysis will consider the wider implications for the professional wrestling world during this era.
1. Match Outcomes
Match outcomes form the core of the AWA January 1984 results, directly shaping the narrative and consequences within the organization. Analyzing individual match results provides crucial insight into the AWA’s competitive landscape during this period. Understanding these outcomes allows for a deeper appreciation of the broader context of professional wrestling at the time.
-
Wins and Losses
Each victory and defeat contributed to a wrestler’s momentum and standing within the AWA. A win could propel a wrestler up the rankings, while a loss could hinder their progress. For example, a victory over a highly ranked opponent could significantly boost a wrestler’s profile. These outcomes shaped future booking decisions and influenced the direction of storylines. In January 1984, specific wins and losses may have had significant ramifications for the AWA, potentially leading to title matches or new rivalries.
-
Match Types
The specific type of match (e.g., singles, tag team, steel cage) influenced the potential outcomes and their significance. A title change was more likely to occur in a championship match, while a steel cage match could be used to conclude a heated feud. Different match types offered varying opportunities for wrestlers to showcase their skills and for storylines to develop. The chosen match types for January 1984 provide insight into the AWA’s booking strategies and the emphasis placed on particular wrestlers or rivalries.
-
Disqualifications and Count-Outs
Matches ending in disqualifications or count-outs, rather than pinfalls or submissions, often indicated ongoing conflict and unresolved tension. These outcomes could be used to extend storylines and maintain audience interest. A disqualification could protect a wrestler from a direct loss while still advancing the narrative. Examining these non-standard outcomes in January 1984 reveals potential narrative threads and the AWA’s approach to long-term storytelling.
-
Title Changes
Championship matches held in January 1984 carried immense weight, as a title change could drastically alter the AWA landscape. A new champion often brought fresh matchups and storyline possibilities. Analyzing which titles changed hands, and to whom, provides crucial context for understanding the AWA’s direction during this period and its impact on the overall narrative arc.
By considering these different facets of match outcomes, a comprehensive understanding of the AWA in January 1984 emerges. These individual results shaped the overall trajectory of the organization, impacting wrestler rankings, storylines, and the broader dynamics of professional wrestling at the time. Further research and analysis can provide a more granular understanding of these outcomes and their long-term consequences.
2. Championship Changes
Championship changes within the American Wrestling Association (AWA) during January 1984 served as pivotal moments, significantly impacting the organization’s trajectory and the broader professional wrestling landscape. These changes represent shifts in power dynamics, the culmination of ongoing storylines, and the potential for fresh narratives. Analyzing title changes offers key insights into the AWA’s booking strategies and the relative importance of specific wrestlers.
For instance, a title change could signify a wrestler’s ascension to main-event status, potentially leading to new rivalries and increased media attention. Conversely, a title loss could mark the beginning of a wrestler’s decline or a shift in their character arc. Hypothetical Example: If a rising star defeated an established champion in January 1984, this could signal a changing of the guard within the AWA, creating new opportunities for younger talent. Alternatively, a dominant champion retaining their title could reinforce their position as the face of the organization. Real-world examples, pending further research, would provide concrete evidence of specific title changes and their immediate and long-term consequences.
Understanding the significance of championship changes within the context of “AWA Jan 84 results” requires considering the broader implications. Title changes acted as catalysts for evolving storylines, impacting wrestler rankings and influencing future match-ups. They provided a tangible measure of success and failure within the AWA, shaping audience perceptions and contributing to the overall narrative arc. Further research into specific AWA events during January 1984 is crucial for a comprehensive understanding of the impact of championship changes. This research would illuminate specific title reigns, challengers, and the surrounding circumstances, offering a more detailed view of the AWA landscape during this period.
3. Wrestler Rankings
Wrestler rankings represent a crucial component when analyzing the American Wrestling Association (AWA) results from January 1984. These rankings reflected the perceived hierarchy of talent within the organization, influencing match-ups, storyline development, and the overall presentation of the AWA product. Examining how these rankings shifted during January 1984 provides insights into the AWA’s booking strategies and the evolving status of its roster.
-
Influence of Match Outcomes
Match outcomes during January 1984 directly impacted wrestler rankings. Victories against higher-ranked opponents elevated a wrestler’s standing, while losses could result in a drop in the rankings. A series of wins could propel a wrestler towards title contention, while a string of defeats might signify a decline in their prominence. Specific examples from January 1984, pending further research, would illustrate how individual match results influenced the overall ranking structure.
-
Championship Implications
Championship status played a significant role in wrestler rankings. The reigning champion typically occupied the top spot within their respective division. Challengers vying for the title were often ranked highly, and their position could fluctuate based on their performance in title matches or other high-profile bouts. Analyzing the championship landscape in January 1984, and any potential title changes, helps contextualize the rankings of the top contenders and the overall hierarchy within the AWA. A new champion could significantly reshape the rankings, particularly if the previous champion held the title for an extended period.
-
Storyline Impact
Wrestler rankings were often intertwined with ongoing storylines. A wrestler’s rise or fall in the rankings could reflect their character development and narrative progression. A push towards the top of the rankings might signify a face turn and growing popularity, while a decline could represent a heel turn and increasing villainy. Specific examples from January 1984, once researched, could showcase how storylines directly impacted wrestler rankings and vice-versa. A wrestler gaining momentum in a storyline might also see a corresponding rise in their ranking.
-
Promotional Considerations
Wrestler rankings served a promotional function, providing a clear hierarchy for marketing purposes. Top-ranked wrestlers received greater prominence in advertising materials and often headlined events. Understanding the rankings helps interpret how the AWA positioned its talent during January 1984 and which wrestlers were considered the main draws. This also helps understand the AWA’s promotional strategies and their efforts to build specific wrestlers as stars.
By examining the interplay between wrestler rankings and the AWA January 1984 results, a more nuanced understanding of the organization’s dynamics emerges. Rankings provide a valuable framework for analyzing the impact of match outcomes, championship implications, storyline development, and promotional strategies. Further research into specific events and wrestler performances during this period would provide concrete examples to illustrate these connections and deepen the analysis of the AWA’s landscape in early 1984. This deeper understanding also sets the stage for analyzing subsequent periods and tracking the evolution of wrestler rankings and their impact on the AWA over time.
4. Emerging storylines
Emerging storylines represent a crucial element within the context of “AWA Jan 84 results,” offering a glimpse into the future direction of the organization and the evolving dynamics between wrestlers. The events of January 1984 served as a breeding ground for new narratives, building upon existing rivalries and introducing fresh conflicts. These emerging storylines provided compelling content, driving audience engagement and shaping the overall trajectory of the AWA. Examining the genesis of these storylines reveals the AWA’s booking strategies and their approach to long-term narrative development.
Specific examples from January 1984, pending further research, would illustrate the direct link between match outcomes and the emergence of new storylines. A surprising upset victory could ignite a feud between an underdog and an established star. A controversial finish, such as a disqualification or interference, could intensify an existing rivalry. The formation of new tag teams or the dissolution of existing ones could also contribute to emerging storylines. Hypothetically, if a popular tag team split in January 1984, this could lead to a heated feud between the former partners, generating significant fan interest and providing ample opportunities for future matches.
Understanding the emergence of these storylines is essential for comprehending the long-term impact of “AWA Jan 84 results.” These narratives played a significant role in shaping the AWA’s future, influencing wrestler rankings, championship pursuits, and the overall presentation of the product. Further research into specific events and wrestler interactions during January 1984 would illuminate the genesis of these storylines and their subsequent development. This deeper understanding contributes to a more complete analysis of the AWA’s landscape during this period and its trajectory in the months that followed. It also provides valuable context for evaluating the AWA’s booking strategies, their effectiveness in building sustained audience interest, and the organization’s broader place within the professional wrestling landscape of the mid-1980s.
5. Key Rivalries
Key rivalries within the American Wrestling Association (AWA) during January 1984 significantly shaped the organization’s narrative and provided compelling content for audiences. Examining these rivalries within the context of “AWA Jan 84 results” offers insights into the AWA’s booking strategies, the dynamics between wrestlers, and the overall landscape of professional wrestling at the time. These rivalries often served as the foundation for major storylines and influenced the outcomes of key matches.
-
Intensification of Existing Rivalries
January 1984 may have witnessed the intensification of pre-existing rivalries within the AWA. Match outcomes, promos, and other storyline developments during this period could have fueled existing tensions between wrestlers, leading to more heated confrontations and higher stakes matches. Research into specific events and storylines from this period would reveal which rivalries were prominent and how they evolved during January 1984. For example, a long-simmering feud between two wrestlers might have escalated following a controversial match outcome, setting the stage for a blow-off match later in the year.
-
Development of New Rivalries
The results from January 1984 may have also sparked the development of entirely new rivalries. Unexpected match outcomes, changing alliances, or clashes of personality could have led to the emergence of fresh conflicts between wrestlers. These newly formed rivalries added depth to the AWA’s roster and provided new avenues for storyline development. For instance, a rising star defeating a veteran wrestler could ignite a rivalry based on generational differences and the pursuit of championship gold.
-
Impact on Championship Pursuits
Key rivalries often intertwined with championship pursuits within the AWA. Rivalries between top contenders and the reigning champion added significance to title matches and provided compelling narratives for audiences to follow. Analyzing title matches and contender rankings from January 1984 reveals how rivalries influenced the championship landscape within the AWA. A rivalry between two top contenders could determine who earned the next title shot, adding another layer of intrigue to their matches.
-
Influence on Match Outcomes
The presence of a heated rivalry often influenced match outcomes. Wrestlers engaged in a rivalry were more likely to resort to underhanded tactics or extreme measures to gain an advantage over their opponent. This could lead to disqualifications, count-outs, or other non-standard finishes, further fueling the rivalry and setting up future confrontations. Examining match results from January 1984 can highlight instances where rivalries directly impacted the outcome and contributed to ongoing storylines. A wrestler seeking revenge against a rival might intentionally get disqualified to inflict more damage and continue the feud.
By exploring the interplay between key rivalries and the “AWA Jan 84 results,” a deeper understanding of the organization’s narrative structure and competitive landscape emerges. These rivalries provided compelling content for audiences, influenced match outcomes, and shaped the trajectory of the AWA. Further research into specific events and wrestler interactions during this period would offer a more granular perspective on the dynamics of these rivalries and their long-term impact on the AWA. This deeper understanding contributes to a more complete picture of the professional wrestling landscape in the early 1984.
6. Attendance Figures
Attendance figures for American Wrestling Association (AWA) events in January 1984 provide crucial insights into the organization’s performance and the effectiveness of its booking strategies. These figures represent a quantifiable measure of audience interest, reflecting the drawing power of specific wrestlers, storylines, and the overall AWA product. Analyzing attendance trends during this period offers valuable context for understanding the “AWA Jan 84 results” and their broader implications. Fluctuations in attendance can indicate the success or failure of specific storylines, the popularity of particular wrestlers, and the overall health of the AWA during this time. High attendance figures suggest strong fan engagement and successful promotional efforts, while declining attendance may signal the need for adjustments in booking strategies or talent acquisition.
Connecting attendance figures to specific “AWA Jan 84 results” requires further research and access to historical data. Hypothetically, if attendance spiked for a particular event in January 1984, this could indicate heightened interest in a specific match or storyline featured on that card. Conversely, low attendance might suggest declining fan interest in a particular wrestler or a general lack of engagement with the AWA product. Real-world examples, once researched, would provide concrete evidence of these correlations and offer more nuanced insights. For example, a significant increase in attendance following the debut of a new wrestler or the culmination of a major storyline would demonstrate the impact of these factors on audience engagement.
Understanding the relationship between attendance figures and “AWA Jan 84 results” offers practical applications for analyzing the AWA’s performance and its place within the broader professional wrestling landscape. These figures provide a tangible metric for evaluating the effectiveness of booking decisions, promotional efforts, and the overall appeal of the AWA product. Analyzing attendance trends over time, in conjunction with other key metrics like television ratings and merchandise sales, can provide a comprehensive assessment of the AWA’s health and its ability to compete with other wrestling organizations. Challenges in accessing historical attendance data may limit the scope of analysis, however, any available data offers valuable context for understanding the AWA in January 1984 and its subsequent trajectory. Further research into these figures, coupled with an analysis of contemporary media coverage and fan sentiment, would enhance this understanding and provide a more complete picture of the AWA during this period.
7. Venue Locations
Venue locations played a significant role in shaping the American Wrestling Association’s (AWA) landscape during January 1984. The choice of venue influenced audience demographics, potential attendance figures, and the overall presentation of the AWA product. Understanding the connection between venue locations and “AWA Jan 84 results” requires considering the geographical distribution of events, the capacity and characteristics of specific venues, and the potential impact on regional fan bases.
Different venues catered to different audience segments. Larger arenas in major cities likely attracted a broader audience, while smaller venues in regional towns cultivated a more localized fan base. This geographical distribution of events influenced the AWA’s reach and its ability to connect with diverse audiences. The specific characteristics of each venue, such as seating capacity, acoustics, and overall atmosphere, also contributed to the fan experience and potentially influenced attendance figures. A well-chosen venue could enhance the presentation of the AWA product, while an unsuitable venue could detract from the overall spectacle. Hypothetical examples, pending further research into specific AWA events in January 1984, could illustrate these connections. For instance, holding a major title match in a smaller, more intimate venue could create a more electric atmosphere compared to a larger arena with a less engaged audience. Conversely, a large arena might be necessary to accommodate the anticipated crowd for a highly anticipated main event.
Analyzing the relationship between venue locations and “AWA Jan 84 results” offers practical insights into the AWA’s operational strategies and its efforts to cultivate regional fan bases. Understanding the geographical distribution of events, the selection criteria for specific venues, and the correlation with attendance figures provides a more nuanced understanding of the AWA’s business model and its approach to market penetration. Further research into specific AWA events during January 1984, including venue details, attendance records, and media coverage, would enhance this analysis and provide more concrete examples. While challenges in accessing historical data may exist, any available information contributes valuable context for understanding the AWA’s operations and the broader professional wrestling landscape in early 1984. This understanding also lays the groundwork for comparing the AWA’s venue strategies with those of competing wrestling organizations, offering a broader perspective on the industry as a whole during this period.
8. Promoter Influence
Promoter influence significantly shaped the American Wrestling Association (AWA) landscape during January 1984. Promoters, as the driving force behind the organization, wielded considerable power over booking decisions, wrestler selection, storyline development, and the overall presentation of the AWA product. Examining the connection between promoter influence and “AWA Jan 84 results” requires analyzing the decision-making processes behind match outcomes, championship pursuits, and the development of key rivalries. Promoters determined which wrestlers received prominent positions on the card, influencing their trajectory within the AWA and their potential for success. A promoter’s preference for a particular wrestling style or storyline could significantly impact the overall direction of the AWA during this period. For example, a promoter’s emphasis on technical wrestling might lead to a greater focus on mat-based matches and a corresponding elevation of wrestlers with strong technical skills. Conversely, a promoter favoring more theatrical or character-driven storylines might prioritize charismatic performers and emphasize storylines involving elaborate angles and dramatic confrontations.
Specific examples from January 1984, pending further research, could illustrate the direct impact of promoter influence on “AWA Jan 84 results.” Hypothetically, a promoter’s decision to push a particular wrestler into a main event spot, despite their relatively low ranking, could indicate a belief in their potential and a desire to elevate their status within the AWA. Alternatively, a promoter’s reluctance to book a popular wrestler in a championship match might reflect concerns about their drawing power or their suitability for a main event role. Real-world examples, once researched, would provide concrete evidence of these influences and offer deeper insights into the AWA’s internal dynamics during this period. For example, if a promoter consistently booked a certain wrestler in high-profile matches and storylines, it could suggest a strong belief in their ability to draw audiences and contribute to the AWA’s success.
Understanding the connection between promoter influence and “AWA Jan 84 results” is crucial for analyzing the AWA’s overall trajectory and its place within the broader professional wrestling landscape. Promoter decisions shaped the narratives, determined the rise and fall of wrestlers, and ultimately influenced the organization’s success or failure. Further research into the specific individuals involved in AWA’s promotional team during January 1984, their individual preferences, and their relationships with wrestlers, would provide a more nuanced understanding of their influence and its impact on “AWA Jan 84 results.” This deeper understanding contributes to a more complete analysis of the AWA during this period, its internal dynamics, and its interaction with the evolving professional wrestling world of the mid-1980s. While challenges in accessing historical records and personal accounts may exist, any available information offers valuable context for understanding the complex interplay between promoter influence and the events that shaped the AWA in January 1984.
9. Media Coverage
Media coverage played a crucial role in shaping public perception and disseminating information regarding the American Wrestling Association (AWA) in January 1984. Print publications, radio broadcasts, and emerging television programs dedicated to professional wrestling served as primary channels for reporting match outcomes, promoting upcoming events, and shaping narratives surrounding wrestlers and storylines. Analyzing media coverage from this period offers valuable insights into how the AWA presented itself to the public, the prominence of specific wrestlers, and the overall reception of “AWA Jan 84 results.” Media narratives could significantly influence audience perceptions, boosting the popularity of certain wrestlers while potentially downplaying others. Positive coverage could enhance a wrestler’s image and drawing power, while negative or critical coverage could hinder their career progression. The extent and tone of media coverage surrounding specific events in January 1984 likely impacted attendance figures, merchandise sales, and the overall success of the AWA during this period.
Examining the interplay between media coverage and “AWA Jan 84 results” requires considering the various media outlets involved and their respective audiences. Specialized wrestling magazines provided in-depth coverage, often catering to dedicated fans. Newspapers and mainstream sports publications offered broader exposure, potentially reaching a wider audience. Radio broadcasts and television programs served as additional channels for disseminating information and promoting upcoming AWA events. Specific examples from January 1984, once researched, could illustrate how different media outlets framed specific events, highlighting particular wrestlers or storylines. For example, a wrestling magazine might focus on the technical aspects of a championship match, while a local newspaper might emphasize the entertainment value and the reactions of the local crowd. Discrepancies in coverage across different media outlets could reveal biases, editorial agendas, or varying interpretations of “AWA Jan 84 results.”
Understanding the connection between media coverage and “AWA Jan 84 results” offers a crucial lens for analyzing the AWA’s promotional strategies, its public image, and its place within the broader media landscape of the time. Media coverage acted as a bridge between the AWA and its audience, shaping perceptions and influencing consumer behavior. Further research into media archives, including newspapers, magazines, and television broadcasts from January 1984, would provide concrete examples of how “AWA Jan 84 results” were portrayed and their impact on the AWA’s overall trajectory. Challenges in accessing historical media archives may limit the scope of analysis; however, any available data offers valuable context for understanding the AWA’s interaction with the media and its efforts to cultivate public interest during this period. This deeper understanding contributes to a more complete picture of the professional wrestling landscape in early 1984, the role of media in shaping public perception, and the AWA’s strategies for navigating this evolving media environment.
Frequently Asked Questions
This section addresses common inquiries regarding the American Wrestling Association (AWA) events of January 1984, aiming to provide clarity and context for this specific period in professional wrestling history.
Question 1: Where can one find documented results for AWA events in January 1984?
Locating documented results often requires consulting specialized wrestling resources. Periodicals such as wrestling magazines, newsletters, and online archives dedicated to wrestling history may contain the desired information. Newspaper archives and local media sources from the time period may also provide relevant coverage.
Question 2: Which prominent wrestlers competed in the AWA during January 1984?
The AWA roster in January 1984 likely featured a mix of established stars and emerging talent. Specific names require further research using the resources mentioned above. Verifying wrestler participation requires cross-referencing multiple sources.
Question 3: Were any championships contested during AWA events in January 1984?
Determining which championships, if any, were contested during this period necessitates examination of documented event results. Title changes and title defenses represent significant events within a wrestling organization’s history.
Question 4: Did any significant storylines or rivalries develop or culminate during this month?
Storyline progression and rivalry development often span multiple events. Analyzing events within the broader context of the AWA’s ongoing narratives provides deeper insights. Media coverage from the time period may offer valuable context regarding storyline development.
Question 5: How did the events of January 1984 impact the AWA’s trajectory for the remainder of the year?
The impact of these events requires analyzing subsequent AWA events and storylines. Match outcomes, championship changes, and emerging rivalries from January 1984 may have influenced the AWA’s direction in the following months. Examining the long-term effects requires further research and analysis.
Question 6: How do the AWA results from January 1984 compare to other wrestling organizations during the same period?
Comparing the AWA’s performance to its competitors requires analyzing results from other organizations during the same timeframe. This comparative analysis provides context for the AWA’s position within the broader professional wrestling landscape. Factors such as attendance figures, media coverage, and the popularity of respective wrestlers offer valuable points of comparison.
Understanding the AWA during January 1984 requires thorough research and cross-referencing multiple sources. These frequently asked questions provide a starting point for exploring this period and its significance within professional wrestling history.
Further sections will delve into more specific aspects of the AWA in January 1984, providing a deeper understanding of the organization, its wrestlers, and the events that shaped its trajectory.
Researching AWA January 1984 Results
Utilizing effective research strategies is crucial for uncovering information regarding American Wrestling Association (AWA) events in January 1984. These tips aim to guide researchers toward relevant resources and facilitate a comprehensive understanding of this specific period in professional wrestling history.
Tip 1: Consult Specialized Wrestling Resources: Explore dedicated wrestling databases, online archives, and historical websites. These resources often contain detailed match results, event listings, and wrestler profiles. Websites like Cagematch.net or The Internet Wrestling Database may offer relevant information.
Tip 2: Utilize Newspaper Archives: Local and national newspapers often published results of wrestling events, providing contemporary accounts and potentially offering insights into local reception. Online newspaper archives and library resources can be invaluable.
Tip 3: Explore Wrestling Magazines and Newsletters: Periodicals dedicated to professional wrestling frequently published detailed event coverage, including match results, interviews, and feature articles. Periodicals from 1984 offer valuable contemporary perspectives.
Tip 4: Cross-Reference Multiple Sources: Comparing information from multiple sources ensures accuracy and helps corroborate findings. Discrepancies between sources can offer additional insights or reveal potential biases.
Tip 5: Consider Regional Variations: Recognize that media coverage and fan reception varied across different regions. Consulting local sources may provide a more nuanced understanding of the AWA’s presence in specific areas.
Tip 6: Focus on Key Individuals and Events: Prioritize research efforts on specific wrestlers, championship matches, or significant storylines to gain a deeper understanding of the AWA landscape in January 1984. Identifying key figures and events helps streamline the research process.
Tip 7: Be Mindful of Potential Biases: Media coverage and historical accounts may reflect certain biases or perspectives. Critical analysis of sources helps ensure a balanced and objective understanding of events.
Employing these research strategies facilitates a more thorough understanding of AWA events during January 1984, contributing to a richer appreciation of professional wrestling history. Effective research unveils the complexities and nuances of this period, offering valuable context for analyzing the AWA’s trajectory and its place within the broader wrestling landscape.
This research serves as a foundation for drawing informed conclusions regarding the AWA in January 1984 and its lasting impact on professional wrestling. The next section will offer a concluding perspective on the significance of “AWA Jan 84 results” and its place within the broader historical narrative.
The Significance of AWA January 1984 Results
Exploration of American Wrestling Association (AWA) events during January 1984 reveals a pivotal period within the organization’s history. Examination of match outcomes, championship changes, wrestler rankings, emerging storylines, key rivalries, attendance figures, venue locations, promoter influence, and media coverage provides a multifaceted understanding of the AWA’s operational landscape during this timeframe. This analysis reveals the complex interplay of factors that shaped the AWA’s trajectory and contributed to the broader narrative of professional wrestling in the mid-1980s. The findings highlight the importance of specific events, wrestler performances, and promotional strategies in determining the AWA’s success and its position within a competitive industry.
Further research and analysis of AWA January 1984 results promise deeper insights into the organization’s evolution and its lasting impact on professional wrestling. Continued investigation offers the potential to uncover nuanced details, challenge existing assumptions, and contribute to a more comprehensive understanding of this critical period. This pursuit of knowledge enriches appreciation for the history of professional wrestling and its enduring legacy. The events of January 1984 serve as a microcosm of the broader forces shaping the industry, offering valuable lessons for contemporary wrestling organizations and enthusiasts alike. Preserving and interpreting these historical records ensures that the contributions of the AWA and its performers are not forgotten.
