Complete 1995 NFL Draft Results & Analysis


Complete 1995 NFL Draft Results & Analysis

The selection of collegiate football players by National Football League teams in the spring of 1995 significantly shaped the league’s landscape for years to come. This process, a key event in the NFL offseason, determined the rosters of each franchise, impacting team performance and individual player careers. Notable selections that year included quarterbacks, running backs, and defensive players who went on to achieve significant success at the professional level.

This particular draft holds historical significance due to the emergence of several future Hall of Fame players and the impact it had on several franchises’ trajectories. The choices made by teams in 1995 influenced competitive balance, shaped rivalries, and contributed to the overall narrative of the NFL during that era. Understanding the outcomes of this draft provides valuable context for analyzing league dynamics in the late 1990s and beyond.

Further exploration will cover specific high-profile selections, analyze team strategies, and discuss the long-term consequences of this crucial event in professional football history.

1. First overall pick

The first overall pick of any NFL draft holds immense significance, representing the perceived best player available and often dictating the direction of the drafting team’s strategy. In the context of the 1995 NFL Draft, this selection held particular weight, shaping the narrative of the draft and influencing subsequent selections. This analysis delves into the specifics of the 1995 first overall pick and its ramifications.

  • Ki-Jana Carter, Running Back, Penn State

    The Cincinnati Bengals selected Ki-Jana Carter first overall. Carter showcased exceptional talent during his collegiate career, leading to high expectations. This selection reflected the prevailing value placed on running backs at the time. While Carter possessed the potential to become a franchise cornerstone, injuries unfortunately derailed his professional career, significantly impacting the Bengals’ trajectory.

  • Pre-Draft Hype and Expectations

    The pre-draft hype surrounding Carter reached a fever pitch, fueled by his on-field performance and the Bengals’ perceived need for a star running back. This intense scrutiny added pressure to Carter’s shoulders and contributed to the narrative surrounding the 1995 draft.

  • Impact on Bengals’ Draft Strategy

    Selecting Carter first overall dictated the Bengals’ subsequent draft choices. The team focused on addressing other needs with their remaining picks, shaping their roster construction for the upcoming season. This decision had long-term consequences, impacting the team’s performance and overall direction.

  • Comparison with Other Top Picks

    Analyzing Carter’s career alongside other top picks in the 1995 draft, such as quarterback Kerry Collins (5th overall) and quarterback Steve McNair (3rd overall), provides valuable context for evaluating the Bengals’ decision and the overall landscape of the draft. Comparing their career trajectories highlights the potential risks and rewards associated with high draft selections.

The selection of Ki-Jana Carter first overall serves as a cautionary tale regarding the unpredictable nature of the NFL draft. While potential and pre-draft projections play a crucial role, injuries and other unforeseen circumstances can significantly alter career trajectories. This pick remains a significant talking point when analyzing the 1995 NFL Draft and its long-term implications for the league.

2. Ki-Jana Carter’s Selection

Ki-Jana Carter’s selection first overall by the Cincinnati Bengals profoundly impacted the 1995 NFL Draft results. This decision, driven by Carter’s exceptional collegiate performance at Penn State, shaped the Bengals’ draft strategy and influenced subsequent selections by other teams. Examining the facets of Carter’s selection provides critical insight into the draft’s overall narrative and long-term consequences.

  • Pre-Draft Hype and Expectations

    Carter entered the draft shrouded in immense hype. His dominant performances at Penn State, combined with the Bengals’ need for a dynamic running back, created significant anticipation. Media outlets and draft analysts projected him as a generational talent, further amplifying expectations surrounding his professional career. This pre-draft buzz significantly influenced the perception of the Bengals’ selection and contributed to the overall narrative of the 1995 draft.

  • Immediate Impact on the Bengals

    Selecting Carter first overall dictated the Bengals’ subsequent draft strategy. With their premier pick allocated to the running back position, the team shifted focus to addressing other roster needs. This decision had long-term implications, shaping the team’s roster construction and influencing their performance in subsequent seasons. The immediate impact of Carter’s selection extended beyond the draft itself, affecting the Bengals’ organizational approach.

  • Career Trajectory and Unfulfilled Potential

    Tragically, a severe knee injury suffered during a preseason game drastically altered Carter’s career trajectory. This devastating setback prevented him from reaching his projected potential, significantly impacting the Bengals’ investment and reshaping the narrative of the 1995 draft. Carter’s unfortunate circumstances serve as a poignant reminder of the inherent risks associated with high draft picks and the unpredictable nature of professional football.

  • Influence on Subsequent Drafts

    While not immediately apparent, Carter’s selection and subsequent career arc influenced future draft strategies across the league. Teams became more cautious about investing heavily in running backs, particularly those with injury concerns. This shift in philosophy contributed to a broader trend of prioritizing other positions, such as quarterbacks and defensive players, in the first round of subsequent drafts. Carter’s case became a cautionary tale, highlighting the importance of thorough medical evaluations and the potential consequences of high-risk, high-reward selections.

Ki-Jana Carter’s selection remains a pivotal moment in the 1995 NFL Draft. While his career was tragically curtailed by injury, the impact of his selection reverberated throughout the league, influencing team strategies, player evaluations, and the overall narrative of the draft. Analyzing this selection provides crucial context for understanding the draft’s complexities and long-term consequences for the NFL.

3. Impactful Quarterbacks

The 1995 NFL Draft stands out for its contribution of several quarterbacks who significantly impacted the league. Analyzing these quarterbacks’ careers provides crucial insight into the draft’s long-term consequences and its effect on team dynamics throughout the late 1990s and beyond. This section explores the most impactful quarterback selections of the 1995 draft and their lasting legacies.

  • Kerry Collins (5th Overall – Carolina Panthers)

    Selected as the expansion Carolina Panthers’ first-ever draft pick, Kerry Collins faced immense pressure from the outset. While his career in Carolina was tumultuous, marked by inconsistency and off-field issues, he later found success with the New York Giants, leading them to Super Bowl XXXV. Collins’ career trajectory exemplifies the complex nature of quarterback development and the varying paths to success in the NFL. His selection played a crucial role in shaping the Panthers’ early identity and ultimately contributed to the broader narrative of quarterbacks drafted in 1995.

  • Steve McNair (3rd Overall – Houston Oilers)

    Drafted third overall by the Houston Oilers (later Tennessee Titans), Steve McNair became a cornerstone of the franchise. Known for his toughness, resilience, and leadership, McNair led the Titans to Super Bowl XXXIV and shared the 2003 NFL MVP award. His career embodied the evolution of the quarterback position, emphasizing mobility and dual-threat capabilities. McNair’s impact on the Titans’ franchise and the league as a whole solidifies his place as one of the most significant quarterbacks from the 1995 draft.

  • Kordell Stewart (60th Overall – Pittsburgh Steelers)

    Though a second-round pick, Kordell Stewart, nicknamed “Slash,” carved a unique niche for himself with the Pittsburgh Steelers. His versatility as a quarterback, runner, and receiver showcased a dynamic skillset that challenged conventional quarterback roles. While his career wasn’t marked by sustained elite-level performance, Stewart’s impact on the game, particularly during his peak years in Pittsburgh, warrants recognition when discussing the quarterbacks of the 1995 draft.

  • Mark Brunell (118th Overall – Green Bay Packers)

    Selected in the fifth round by the Green Bay Packers, Mark Brunell eventually became a Pro Bowl quarterback for the Jacksonville Jaguars. His success as a later-round pick underscores the unpredictable nature of the draft and the potential for hidden gems to emerge. Brunell’s career trajectory adds another layer of complexity to the analysis of the 1995 quarterback class, demonstrating the value of late-round selections and their potential impact on the league.

The 1995 NFL Draft produced a diverse group of quarterbacks who experienced varying levels of success. From top picks facing immediate pressure to late-round selections exceeding expectations, the quarterbacks of this draft class significantly influenced the NFL landscape. Analyzing their careers provides valuable insight into the draft’s long-term consequences and its contribution to the evolution of the quarterback position. The successes and failures of these quarterbacks shaped team trajectories, impacted league dynamics, and contributed to the ongoing narrative of the 1995 NFL Draft as a significant moment in league history.

4. Team Strategies

Team strategies played a crucial role in shaping the 1995 NFL Draft results. Each franchise approached the draft with specific needs and objectives, influencing their selection choices and ultimately impacting the league’s landscape. Analyzing these strategies provides valuable context for understanding the draft’s outcomes and long-term consequences.

  • Need-Based Drafting

    Several teams prioritized addressing immediate roster needs. The Cincinnati Bengals, for example, selected running back Ki-Jana Carter first overall to bolster their rushing attack. Similarly, the Houston Oilers drafted quarterback Steve McNair third overall, aiming to solidify their offensive leadership. This need-based approach reflected a practical strategy focused on filling specific gaps within their respective rosters.

  • Best Player Available

    Some teams adopted a “best player available” (BPA) strategy, selecting the highest-rated player regardless of positional need. The Carolina Panthers, as an expansion team, embraced this approach, selecting quarterback Kerry Collins fifth overall despite having other pressing needs. This strategy aimed to acquire top talent, believing that elite players, regardless of position, would ultimately contribute to long-term success.

  • Trading Draft Picks

    Draft-day trades significantly influenced the 1995 draft results. Teams exchanged picks to acquire desired players or accumulate future draft capital. The Dallas Cowboys notably traded their first-round pick to the Philadelphia Eagles for wide receiver Alvin Harper, demonstrating a willingness to sacrifice draft position for immediate roster upgrades. These trades often reshaped team strategies and introduced an element of unpredictability into the draft process.

  • Focus on Specific Positions

    Certain positions received heightened attention in the 1995 draft. The demand for running backs, exemplified by Ki-Jana Carter’s selection, reflected the prevailing offensive philosophies of the time. Similarly, the emphasis on quarterbacks, with notable selections like Kerry Collins and Steve McNair, highlighted the importance of securing a franchise signal-caller. This focus on specific positions influenced team strategies and contributed to the overall narrative of the draft.

Analyzing team strategies in the 1995 NFL Draft reveals a complex interplay of factors influencing decision-making. Need-based drafting, the best player available approach, draft-day trades, and the focus on specific positions all contributed to the draft’s outcomes and shaped the league’s future. Understanding these strategies provides valuable context for evaluating the draft’s impact and appreciating the complexities of team roster construction in the NFL.

5. Long-Term Success

Evaluating the long-term success of the 1995 NFL Draft requires analyzing individual player careers, team performance, and the overall impact on the league’s landscape. This assessment considers factors beyond immediate draft grades and projections, focusing on sustained contributions and lasting legacies. Examining the long-term success stories and disappointments of this draft provides crucial context for understanding its true significance.

  • Hall of Fame Careers

    The 1995 draft produced several Hall of Fame players, solidifying its place as a historically significant event. Players like Warren Sapp (12th overall) and Curtis Martin (74th overall) achieved sustained excellence, demonstrating the draft’s ability to identify and cultivate generational talent. These Hall of Fame careers validate the draft’s long-term success and highlight the impact of effective scouting and player development.

  • Franchise Cornerstones

    Beyond individual accolades, several players from the 1995 draft became franchise cornerstones for their respective teams. Steve McNair, for example, transformed the Tennessee Titans into a perennial playoff contender. These players, while not necessarily Hall of Famers, provided consistent high-level performance and leadership, contributing significantly to their teams’ long-term success. Their impact underscores the importance of drafting players who fit a team’s culture and scheme.

  • Impact on Team Dynasties

    While challenging to directly attribute team dynasties solely to a single draft, the 1995 draft undoubtedly contributed to the success of several franchises. The talent acquired in this draft provided foundational pieces for sustained periods of competitiveness. Analyzing the rosters of successful teams from the late 1990s and early 2000s reveals the presence of key players drafted in 1995, highlighting the draft’s influence on long-term team success.

  • Unfulfilled Potential and Draft Busts

    Conversely, the 1995 draft also featured instances of unfulfilled potential and outright draft busts. Ki-Jana Carter’s career, tragically derailed by injury, serves as a prominent example. Analyzing these disappointments provides valuable lessons about the inherent risks associated with the draft process and the unpredictable nature of player development. These cases offer crucial counterpoints to the success stories, providing a balanced perspective on the draft’s long-term impact.

Assessing the long-term success of the 1995 NFL Draft requires considering both the triumphs and the disappointments. The emergence of Hall of Fame players, franchise cornerstones, and contributions to team dynasties demonstrate the draft’s ability to shape the league’s landscape for years to come. However, the instances of unfulfilled potential and draft busts serve as important reminders of the inherent uncertainties within the draft process. Analyzing these diverse outcomes provides a comprehensive understanding of the 1995 draft’s lasting legacy and its impact on the NFL.

6. Busts and Steals

Evaluating any NFL draft requires acknowledging the inherent disparity between pre-draft projections and eventual career trajectories. The 1995 NFL Draft, like others, produced its share of “busts” players who failed to meet expectations and “steals” players who significantly outperformed their draft position. Analyzing these outcomes provides crucial insight into the complexities of player evaluation and the unpredictable nature of professional football. This exploration delves into the notable busts and steals of the 1995 draft, highlighting their impact on teams and the draft’s overall narrative.

  • High-Profile Busts

    The 1995 draft featured several high-profile busts, notably Ki-Jana Carter, the first overall pick. Carter’s career, hampered by injuries, serves as a cautionary tale regarding the risks associated with high draft selections. Other early-round picks who failed to live up to expectations underscore the challenges of projecting collegiate success onto the professional level. These busts significantly impacted team strategies and influenced future draft decisions.

  • Late-Round Gems

    Conversely, the 1995 draft unearthed several late-round gems who outperformed their draft position. Players like Mark Brunell, a fifth-round selection, and Curtis Martin, a third-round pick, became Pro Bowlers and, in Martin’s case, a Hall of Famer. These unexpected successes demonstrate the potential for undervalued talent to emerge and significantly contribute to team success. Identifying these late-round steals highlights the importance of thorough scouting and player development.

  • Impact on Team Trajectories

    Both busts and steals significantly impacted team trajectories. High draft picks who failed to perform hindered team progress, while late-round steals provided unexpected boosts. The presence of busts and steals within a draft class often determined a team’s long-term competitiveness and influenced their subsequent draft strategies. Analyzing these impacts provides valuable context for evaluating the overall success of a draft class.

  • Re-evaluating Draft Strategies

    The presence of busts and steals in the 1995 draft prompts a re-evaluation of draft strategies. The successes of late-round picks challenge the conventional wisdom of prioritizing early-round selections. Analyzing these outcomes encourages teams to refine their scouting processes, consider a wider range of player profiles, and prioritize potential over perceived positional value. The lessons learned from the 1995 draft continue to inform modern draft strategies.

The busts and steals of the 1995 NFL Draft offer valuable insights into the complexities of player evaluation and the unpredictable nature of professional football. Analyzing these outcomes reveals the inherent risks and rewards associated with the draft process, highlighting the importance of thorough scouting, player development, and adaptable draft strategies. The lessons learned from the 1995 draft continue to shape how teams approach the draft and evaluate talent, contributing to the ongoing evolution of roster construction in the NFL.

7. Draft Day Trades

Draft day trades represent a crucial element within the complex tapestry of the 1995 NFL Draft results. These real-time transactions, driven by team needs and strategic maneuvering, significantly altered the draft’s landscape, impacting team rosters and individual player careers. Analyzing these trades provides valuable insight into the decision-making processes of NFL franchises and their pursuit of competitive advantage.

  • Reshaping Team Strategies

    Draft day trades often necessitate immediate adjustments to team strategies. A sudden influx of draft capital or the unexpected acquisition of a specific player can force teams to re-evaluate their pre-draft plans and adapt to the evolving dynamics of the draft. The 1995 draft witnessed several such instances, where trades prompted teams to shift their focus, target different positions, or accumulate picks for future drafts. These real-time adjustments underscore the fluid nature of draft day proceedings and the importance of adaptability.

  • Addressing Immediate Needs

    Teams frequently utilize draft day trades to address immediate roster needs. If a highly coveted player at a position of need becomes available, a team might trade up to secure that player. Conversely, a team might trade down to acquire additional picks, addressing multiple needs with a broader selection of players. The 1995 draft showcased instances of both strategies, demonstrating the diverse ways teams leverage trades to achieve their roster-building objectives. The Dallas Cowboys’ trade for established wide receiver Alvin Harper exemplifies this approach, sacrificing future draft capital for immediate on-field impact.

  • Impact on Player Careers

    Draft day trades directly impact player careers. A player traded to a different team experiences a shift in environment, coaching staff, and teammates, potentially altering their developmental trajectory and long-term prospects. The 1995 draft featured several players whose careers were significantly influenced by draft day trades, underscoring the ripple effects of these transactions on individual players. While difficult to quantify precisely, the impact on player development and opportunity resulting from these trades plays a crucial role in shaping the league’s future landscape.

  • Long-Term Implications

    The ramifications of draft day trades often extend far beyond the immediate draft itself. Trades involving future draft picks can influence a team’s roster construction for years to come, impacting their ability to acquire talent and build a competitive roster. The 1995 draft’s trades shaped the fortunes of several franchises, contributing to both successes and setbacks in subsequent seasons. Analyzing these long-term implications provides valuable context for evaluating the true impact of draft day trades on team performance and league dynamics.

Draft day trades represent a dynamic and influential component of the 1995 NFL Draft results. By reshaping team strategies, addressing immediate needs, impacting player careers, and generating long-term implications, these trades played a crucial role in shaping the league’s landscape. Analyzing these transactions provides a deeper understanding of the complexities of the draft process and the strategic considerations that drive team decision-making in the pursuit of building a successful franchise.

8. Legacy and Influence

The 1995 NFL Draft left an enduring legacy, influencing subsequent drafts, shaping team trajectories, and contributing to the broader narrative of professional football. Examining this legacy requires analyzing its multifaceted impact, considering both immediate consequences and long-term effects on the league. This exploration delves into the various ways the 1995 draft continues to resonate within the NFL.

  • Shifting Team Philosophies

    The outcomes of the 1995 draft, particularly the experiences with high-profile running backs like Ki-Jana Carter, influenced how teams approached positional value and roster construction. The emphasis on running backs in the early rounds began to wane, with teams increasingly prioritizing quarterbacks and defensive players. This shift in philosophy reflects a direct response to the 1995 draft’s outcomes and its impact on team-building strategies.

  • Emphasis on Quarterback Development

    The careers of quarterbacks drafted in 1995, such as Kerry Collins and Steve McNair, provided valuable insights into quarterback development and the importance of patience. While both players experienced early career struggles, their eventual successes demonstrated the potential for quarterbacks to mature and improve over time. This emphasis on long-term development became increasingly relevant in subsequent drafts, shaping how teams evaluated and nurtured young quarterbacks.

  • Impact of Draft Day Trades

    The draft day trades of 1995 demonstrated the potential for these transactions to reshape team fortunes. The Dallas Cowboys’ acquisition of Alvin Harper, while ultimately unsuccessful, exemplified the willingness of teams to sacrifice draft capital for immediate roster upgrades. This trend continued in subsequent drafts, with teams increasingly leveraging trades to address specific needs and acquire established talent. The strategic use of trades became a defining characteristic of draft day proceedings, directly influenced by the precedent set in 1995.

  • Long-Term Roster Construction

    The 1995 draft’s impact extended beyond immediate roster considerations, influencing long-term team-building strategies. The successes and failures of players drafted in 1995 provided valuable lessons about player evaluation, positional value, and the importance of character assessment. Teams learned from the mistakes and triumphs of this draft, applying those lessons to subsequent drafts and refining their approaches to roster construction. The 1995 draft served as a valuable case study in long-term roster management.

The 1995 NFL Draft’s legacy continues to shape the league. From shifting team philosophies and an increased emphasis on quarterback development to the impact of draft day trades and long-term roster construction, the 1995 draft provides a crucial reference point for understanding how the NFL evolved. Analyzing its successes and failures offers valuable lessons for teams, players, and analysts alike, solidifying its place as a pivotal moment in the history of professional football. Its influence resonates even today, shaping how teams approach the draft and build their rosters for sustained success.

Frequently Asked Questions

This section addresses common inquiries regarding the 1995 NFL Draft, providing concise and informative responses.

Question 1: Who was the first overall pick in the 1995 NFL Draft?

Ki-Jana Carter, a running back from Penn State University, was selected first overall by the Cincinnati Bengals.

Question 2: Why is the 1995 Draft considered significant?

The 1995 Draft is notable for producing several future Hall of Fame players, impactful quarterbacks, and shaping long-term team trajectories, despite also featuring some high-profile draft busts.

Question 3: Which quarterbacks made a significant impact from this draft class?

Kerry Collins, Steve McNair, and to a lesser extent, Kordell Stewart and Mark Brunell, all contributed significantly to the league following their selection in 1995.

Question 4: Were there any notable draft day trades?

Yes, the Dallas Cowboys traded their first-round pick for established wide receiver Alvin Harper, highlighting a trend of teams seeking immediate impact players.

Question 5: How did the 1995 Draft influence future drafts?

Experiences with players like Ki-Jana Carter led to shifts in team philosophies regarding positional value, particularly at running back, and an increased emphasis on thorough player evaluation.

Question 6: Where can one find comprehensive results of the 1995 NFL Draft?

Several online resources, including reputable sports news websites and databases like Pro-Football-Reference, offer detailed information and statistics regarding the 1995 NFL Draft.

Understanding the nuances of the 1995 NFL Draft provides valuable context for analyzing the evolution of the league and the ongoing complexities of player evaluation and team-building strategies.

Further sections will delve deeper into specific aspects of the draft, offering more detailed analyses and insights.

Draft Analysis Tips

Analyzing historical NFL drafts requires a multifaceted approach, considering various factors beyond simply the initial draft order. The following tips offer valuable perspectives for understanding the complexities and long-term implications of drafts, using the 1995 NFL Draft as a relevant example.

Tip 1: Consider Contextual Factors

Each draft occurs within a specific context influenced by league trends, team needs, and prevailing offensive/defensive philosophies. The emphasis on running backs in the 1995 draft reflected the offensive landscape of that era. Understanding these contextual factors provides crucial insights into team decision-making.

Tip 2: Evaluate Long-Term Impact, Not Just Initial Projections

Ki-Jana Carter’s selection exemplifies the importance of long-term evaluation. While highly touted initially, injuries derailed his career. Analyzing sustained performance and career trajectories offers a more accurate assessment of a draft’s success.

Tip 3: Recognize the Importance of Late-Round Selections

Players like Mark Brunell, a fifth-round pick in 1995, demonstrate the potential for late-round selections to significantly contribute. Overlooking these later picks can lead to an incomplete understanding of a draft’s impact.

Tip 4: Analyze Draft Day Trades and Their Implications

Trades significantly alter draft outcomes. Analyzing the rationale behind trades, the players involved, and their subsequent performance provides crucial insights into team strategies and long-term roster construction. The Dallas Cowboys’ trade for Alvin Harper in 1995 exemplifies this dynamic.

Tip 5: Acknowledge the Unpredictability of Player Development

Not all highly touted prospects reach their full potential, and some late-round picks exceed expectations. Acknowledging this inherent unpredictability fosters a more nuanced understanding of draft analysis.

Tip 6: Research Team Needs and Draft Strategies

Understanding a team’s pre-draft needs and their overall draft strategy provides context for their selections. Were they prioritizing immediate needs or building for the future? Analyzing team motivations enhances draft analysis.

Tip 7: Utilize Reputable Resources for Data and Analysis

Reliable sources, such as Pro-Football-Reference and established sports news outlets, offer valuable data and expert analysis, facilitating informed assessments of draft outcomes.

By employing these tips, one can move beyond simplistic rankings and develop a more comprehensive understanding of the complexities and long-term implications of NFL drafts, illustrated effectively by the 1995 NFL Draft.

The following conclusion synthesizes the key takeaways from this in-depth analysis of the 1995 NFL Draft.

1995 NFL Draft Results

Analysis of the 1995 NFL Draft reveals a pivotal moment in league history, significantly impacting team trajectories and individual player careers. From Ki-Jana Carter’s unfortunate injury to the emergence of quarterbacks like Kerry Collins and Steve McNair, the draft highlighted the unpredictable nature of talent evaluation and player development. Draft day trades, team strategies, and the identification of both busts and steals further shaped the draft’s narrative and long-term consequences. The selection of future Hall of Fame players, alongside the unfulfilled potential of others, underscores the complexities of projecting collegiate success onto the professional level. Examining the 1995 draft provides valuable context for understanding the evolution of team-building strategies, the importance of adaptability, and the ever-present risk-reward dynamic inherent in the draft process.

The 1995 NFL Draft serves as a valuable case study for understanding the intricacies of talent acquisition and its impact on the NFL landscape. Further research and analysis of subsequent drafts, informed by the lessons of 1995, contribute to a deeper appreciation of the ongoing challenges and triumphs of building a successful NFL franchise. The draft remains a cornerstone of the league, its outcomes shaping narratives and influencing the future of professional football.