The outcome of the 108th running of this historic race provided a snapshot of competitive distance running in the early 21st century. Information documenting the finishing times and places of elite runners, as well as the broader field of participants, offers a valuable record for both competitive analysis and personal achievement. Data from this particular race might include details on age group winners, qualifying times, and nationality of competitors, adding to a broader statistical understanding of the event.
Documentation of this specific competition holds significance for several reasons. It serves as a historical record, allowing researchers and enthusiasts to track the progression of athletic performance over time. The data can be used to analyze training methods, understand the impact of various factors on race outcomes, and appreciate the dedication and accomplishments of the athletes involved. Moreover, the results hold personal significance for individual runners, marking a milestone in their athletic journeys. This information contributes to the ongoing narrative of the Boston Marathon’s rich history and enduring legacy.
Further exploration could delve into specific details regarding winning times, noteworthy performances, and the overall context of the 2004 race within the broader history of the marathon. Analysis of training regimens, competitor demographics, and the impact of weather conditions could provide additional insights. The stories of individual runners and their personal triumphs within the larger event offer a compelling human dimension to this sporting event.
1. Winning Times
Winning times represent a crucial component of the 2004 Boston Marathon results. They offer a quantifiable measure of elite athletic performance, serving as a benchmark for future competitors and a historical record of achievement. In the 2004 race, Timothy Cherigat of Kenya won the men’s race with a time of 2:10:37. Catherine Ndereba, also of Kenya, secured victory in the women’s race, finishing in 2:24:27. These times reflect not only the individual athletes’ capabilities but also the prevailing race conditions, including weather and course terrain.
Analysis of winning times allows for comparisons across different years, revealing trends in performance and the impact of various factors such as training advancements and evolving race strategies. Comparing Cherigat’s time to previous winning times provides context for his performance and allows for assessment relative to the history of the race. For instance, his time was slower than the course record, indicating potential influences like weather or the competitive landscape that year. Furthermore, winning times often inspire aspiring runners and contribute to the ongoing narrative surrounding the Boston Marathon’s prestige.
In summary, winning times are integral to understanding the 2004 Boston Marathon results. They provide valuable data points for analyzing athletic performance, contextualizing historical trends, and appreciating the dedication required to excel in this challenging event. Examining these times offers insight into the broader narrative of the marathon and its enduring significance within the world of competitive running. Further research could explore the specific training methods employed by the winning athletes, offering deeper understanding of the factors contributing to their success.
2. Course Records
Course records provide a crucial point of comparison for analyzing results within the context of the Boston Marathon’s history. By examining how the 2004 results measure up against the fastest times ever recorded on the course, one gains a deeper understanding of the performances achieved that year. Course records represent the pinnacle of achievement on a specific course, offering a benchmark against which all other performances are measured. Analyzing the 2004 Boston Marathon results in relation to existing course records provides valuable context and perspective.
-
Men’s Course Record
At the time of the 2004 race, the men’s course record stood at 2:08:07, set by Khalid Khannouchi in 1999. Comparing Timothy Cherigat’s 2004 winning time of 2:10:37 to this record illustrates that, while a strong performance, it did not surpass the existing benchmark. This comparison allows for an objective evaluation of Cherigat’s performance within the historical context of the race.
-
Women’s Course Record
Margaret Okayo held the women’s course record of 2:20:43, set in 2002. Catherine Ndereba’s 2004 winning time of 2:24:27, while a victory, fell short of this record. This comparison highlights the enduring nature of course records and the exceptional performances required to break them. It also provides a benchmark for Ndereba’s performance relative to the fastest ever recorded on the course.
-
Impact of Conditions
Course records are not solely dependent on athletic prowess; they are also influenced by external factors like weather and course conditions. Analyzing the conditions prevalent during the 2004 race, such as temperature and wind, can provide insight into the difficulty of surpassing course records. Understanding these conditions allows for a nuanced interpretation of the 2004 results, recognizing that achieving a course record requires not only exceptional athleticism but also favorable circumstances.
-
Motivation for Future Races
The existence of course records serves as a powerful motivator for future marathon runners. The challenge of surpassing these benchmarks drives athletes to strive for peak performance. The 2004 results, while not establishing new records, likely fueled the ambition of future competitors seeking to etch their names into the annals of Boston Marathon history. This ongoing pursuit of excellence contributes to the enduring legacy of the race.
By considering the 2004 Boston Marathon results in relation to existing course records, a richer understanding of the race’s dynamics emerges. The interplay between individual performance, historical benchmarks, and external factors offers a comprehensive perspective on the event and its significance within the broader context of competitive running. This analysis allows for appreciation of the enduring challenge presented by the Boston Marathon course and the exceptional athleticism required to achieve record-breaking times. Further exploration could involve comparing the 2004 results with subsequent races to track the progression of performance over time.
3. Elite Performances
Elite performances shape the narrative surrounding the 2004 Boston Marathon results. These top-tier achievements provide a focal point for analysis, setting the standard against which other runners are measured and contributing significantly to the event’s overall prestige. Examining these performances offers insights into training methodologies, competitive strategies, and the physiological limits of human endurance. In 2004, Timothy Cherigat’s winning time of 2:10:37 and Catherine Ndereba’s 2:24:27, while not record-breaking, exemplified elite-level performance. These results, alongside other top finishers, represent the culmination of years of dedicated training and strategic racing. Analyzing these performances allows for comparisons with previous years and across different competitive fields, providing valuable data for researchers and aspiring athletes alike. For example, comparing Cherigat’s and Ndereba’s performances with their past race times or those of their competitors helps contextualize their achievements within the broader field of elite marathon running.
The impact of elite performances extends beyond individual achievement. They serve as inspiration for aspiring runners, demonstrating the possibilities of human potential. These performances also contribute to the broader appeal and marketability of the Boston Marathon. Media coverage often focuses on elite runners, attracting sponsorships and generating excitement among spectators. The ripple effect of these performances contributes to the economic impact of the race and fosters a sense of community among runners of all skill levels. Moreover, analyzing the strategies employed by elite runners, such as pacing and hydration, offers valuable lessons for both amateur and professional athletes seeking to improve their own performance. Specific examples might include analyzing Cherigat’s pacing strategy throughout the race or Ndereba’s approach to hydration under the prevailing weather conditions. Such analysis offers practical, actionable insights derived from the study of elite performances.
In conclusion, understanding elite performances is essential to comprehending the 2004 Boston Marathon results. These performances offer a quantifiable measure of athletic excellence, provide inspiration for the wider running community, and contribute significantly to the event’s prominence. Examining both the individual accomplishments and the broader context surrounding these performances reveals valuable insights into the world of competitive marathon running and its enduring appeal. Further investigation might explore the specific training regimens and nutritional strategies employed by the elite athletes in 2004, offering deeper insights into the factors contributing to their success. This research could provide valuable lessons for future generations of marathon runners and further enhance understanding of the complexities of elite athletic performance.
4. Age Group Winners
Analyzing age group winners within the 2004 Boston Marathon results provides valuable insights beyond the overall race outcome. It offers a glimpse into the performance of non-elite runners, highlighting dedication and achievement across various demographics. Examining these results reveals trends in age-related performance, showcases inspiring stories of perseverance, and adds depth to the understanding of the race’s impact across a wider spectrum of participants. This granular perspective complements the focus on elite runners and contributes to a more comprehensive narrative of the event.
-
Performance Across Age Spectrums
Age group results illustrate how performance varies across different age demographics. The winning times within each age bracket provide a benchmark for runners of similar ages, allowing for comparisons and self-assessment. Examining these times helps gauge the impact of age on performance within the context of a challenging race like the Boston Marathon. This data can inform training strategies, set realistic goals, and provide motivation for runners across various age groups. Specific examples from the 2004 results, such as the winning time in the 40-44 male age group compared to the 25-29 age group, could illustrate these age-related performance trends.
-
Inspiration and Motivation
The achievements of age group winners often serve as a source of inspiration for other runners. These individuals demonstrate that competitive running can continue and even thrive at all ages. Their accomplishments underscore the importance of consistent training, dedication, and pursuing personal goals regardless of age. Highlighting specific stories of perseverance from the 2004 race, such as an individual overcoming an injury to win their age group, could add a compelling human element to the analysis. This focus on personal narratives reinforces the inspirational aspect of age group achievements.
-
Participation and Inclusivity
The recognition of age group winners reinforces the inclusive nature of the Boston Marathon. It highlights the event’s appeal to a wide range of participants beyond elite athletes, promoting a sense of community and shared achievement. Examining the number of participants within each age group in 2004 offers insight into the race’s demographics and underscores its broad appeal. This focus on inclusivity reinforces the marathon’s significance as a participatory event, celebrating athletic achievement at all levels.
-
Longitudinal Performance Tracking
Following age group winners over multiple years allows for tracking of longitudinal performance trends. This analysis reveals how individual runners progress and adapt their training as they age. It also provides valuable data for researchers studying the physiological effects of aging on athletic performance. For instance, tracking a specific runner’s age group performances across multiple Boston Marathons could provide valuable insights into their individual trajectory and the broader trends of age-related performance within the context of the race.
In summary, analyzing age group winners provides a rich, nuanced understanding of the 2004 Boston Marathon results. It complements the narrative surrounding elite performances by showcasing the achievements of a broader range of participants. This analysis reveals trends in age-related performance, provides inspiration for runners of all ages, and reinforces the inclusive nature of the Boston Marathon. By exploring these results, a more complete picture of the event’s impact on the running community emerges, celebrating the dedication and perseverance of athletes across all demographics. This focus on age group winners contributes to a more holistic and engaging narrative of the 2004 Boston Marathon.
5. Participant Demographics
Participant demographics offer valuable context for understanding the 2004 Boston Marathon results. Analyzing factors such as age, gender, nationality, and running experience provides insights into the composition of the field and potential influences on race outcomes. Demographic data allows for a deeper understanding of participation trends, the representation of various groups within the race, and the potential correlation between demographic factors and performance. For instance, examining the number of runners from different countries participating in 2004 might reveal the international reach of the event and the influence of national running programs on participation rates. Similarly, analyzing the age distribution of participants might reveal trends in age-related participation in marathon running and offer insights into training and performance patterns across age groups. Examining the gender distribution within the race allows for comparisons of performance between men and women and can highlight disparities or progress in participation rates over time.
The practical significance of understanding participant demographics extends beyond simply quantifying the field. This data can inform race organizers in areas such as resource allocation, course design, and targeted outreach programs. For example, understanding the prevalence of certain age groups or nationalities among participants can inform decisions regarding aid station placement or language support services. Demographic data can also be valuable for sponsors seeking to understand the audience reached through the marathon, influencing marketing strategies and sponsorship decisions. Furthermore, researchers can use demographic data to study trends in marathon participation, analyze the impact of training programs on specific demographic groups, and investigate potential correlations between demographic factors and performance outcomes. For example, researchers might investigate whether runners from certain countries or age groups tend to perform better at the Boston Marathon, leading to further investigation of training methods, genetic predispositions, or cultural influences.
In summary, participant demographics represent a critical component of the 2004 Boston Marathon results analysis. This data offers insights into the composition and diversity of the field, potential correlations between demographic factors and performance, and practical applications for race organizers, sponsors, and researchers. By examining these demographics, a more comprehensive and nuanced understanding of the race emerges, extending beyond individual results to encompass the broader trends and social contexts shaping marathon participation and performance. Further research into the specific demographic trends observed in the 2004 Boston Marathon could yield valuable insights for the ongoing development and inclusivity of the event.
6. Weather Conditions
Weather conditions play a significant role in marathon performance, and the 2004 Boston Marathon provides a case study for understanding this impact. Analyzing the specific weather conditions prevalent during the race illuminates how environmental factors can influence outcomes, from elite performances to the experiences of everyday runners. Temperature, humidity, wind speed, and precipitation can all affect runners’ hydration, body temperature regulation, and overall energy expenditure. Therefore, understanding the weather conditions on race day is crucial for interpreting the 2004 results accurately.
-
Temperature
Temperature significantly impacts a runner’s ability to regulate body heat. Higher temperatures can lead to dehydration, heat exhaustion, and decreased performance. Conversely, cooler temperatures can be advantageous, reducing the risk of overheating. Examining the temperature during the 2004 race reveals how this factor might have influenced runners’ hydration strategies and overall race times. For instance, a warmer-than-average day could explain slower finishing times across the field.
-
Humidity
High humidity hinders the body’s ability to cool itself through sweat evaporation, increasing the risk of heat-related illnesses. Even at moderate temperatures, high humidity can significantly impair performance. Analyzing the humidity levels in 2004 provides further insight into the challenges faced by runners and potential contributing factors to race outcomes. High humidity, coupled with elevated temperatures, could have presented significant challenges for runners in 2004.
-
Wind Speed and Direction
Wind can either assist or impede runners depending on its speed and direction. Headwinds increase the effort required to maintain pace, while tailwinds can provide a beneficial push. Examining wind conditions during the 2004 race provides context for understanding performance fluctuations and potential advantages or disadvantages experienced by runners. A strong headwind on certain sections of the course could explain slower split times for runners in 2004.
-
Precipitation
Rain or other forms of precipitation can impact footing, visibility, and body temperature regulation. These conditions can make the course more challenging and increase the risk of slips or falls. Analyzing whether precipitation occurred during the 2004 race and, if so, its intensity and duration, further clarifies the conditions faced by participants. Heavy rain during the race could explain an increased incidence of injuries or slower overall times.
In conclusion, considering weather conditions is essential for a comprehensive understanding of the 2004 Boston Marathon results. Analyzing temperature, humidity, wind, and precipitation offers valuable context for interpreting performances and appreciating the challenges faced by runners. These factors can influence individual race strategies, overall race times, and the likelihood of heat-related issues or other complications. By examining these conditions alongside race data, a more nuanced and complete understanding of the 2004 Boston Marathon emerges, emphasizing the significant interplay between environmental factors and athletic performance. Comparing the 2004 weather conditions with those of other years can further highlight the impact of weather on race outcomes across different editions of the Boston Marathon.
7. Qualifying Times
Qualifying times represent a critical component for understanding the field of participants in the 2004 Boston Marathon. These times, established based on age and gender, serve as a performance benchmark, ensuring a competitive field while also reflecting the inherent challenges of the course. Examining the qualifying times for the 2004 race provides insights into the caliber of runners participating and the standards required to compete in this prestigious event. The Boston Athletic Association (B.A.A.) establishes these qualifying standards, and meeting these times acts as a gatekeeping mechanism, effectively shaping the demographic of runners participating each year. For example, a 35-year-old male would have been required to run a marathon in under 3 hours and 10 minutes to qualify for the 2004 Boston Marathon. This requirement ensured that participants possessed a demonstrable level of fitness and experience, contributing to the overall competitiveness of the race.
The qualifying times for the 2004 Boston Marathon had several significant effects on the race results. Firstly, they shaped the overall performance distribution, ensuring a dense concentration of runners capable of finishing within a reasonable timeframe. This contributed to the fast pace often observed in Boston and likely influenced the strategies employed by runners throughout the race. Secondly, the qualifying times impacted the competitive dynamic within different age and gender groups. By establishing specific standards for each demographic, the qualifying times created a level playing field within those groupings, fostering a sense of fair competition and enabling meaningful comparisons of performance within specific demographics. Finally, the existence of qualifying times adds to the prestige of the Boston Marathon. Achieving a qualifying time becomes a goal in itself for many runners, representing a significant accomplishment and driving participation in qualifying races worldwide. This adds another layer of competition and elevates the perceived value of participation in the Boston Marathon. For instance, a runner aiming to qualify might structure their training around achieving the qualifying time, influencing their choice of races and overall training plan.
In summary, qualifying times represent a fundamental aspect of the 2004 Boston Marathon, influencing the participant field, shaping race dynamics, and contributing to the event’s prestige. Understanding these qualifying standards and their impact is crucial for a comprehensive analysis of the race results and the broader context of competitive marathon running. Further analysis might explore the historical evolution of qualifying times for the Boston Marathon, examining how these standards have changed over time and the rationale behind these adjustments. This could provide further insights into the evolving nature of competitive marathon running and the challenges of balancing inclusivity with maintaining a high standard of performance.
Frequently Asked Questions
This section addresses common inquiries regarding the 2004 Boston Marathon results, providing concise and informative responses.
Question 1: Who won the 2004 Boston Marathon?
Timothy Cherigat of Kenya won the men’s race, and Catherine Ndereba, also of Kenya, won the women’s race.
Question 2: What were the winning times?
Timothy Cherigat finished in 2:10:37, and Catherine Ndereba finished in 2:24:27.
Question 3: Were any course records broken in 2004?
No course records were broken in the 2004 Boston Marathon.
Question 4: Where can one find detailed race results?
Detailed results, including age group breakdowns and finishing times for all participants, can often be found on the official Boston Athletic Association (B.A.A.) website and various running news archives.
Question 5: How did weather conditions affect the 2004 race?
Weather conditions always play a role in marathon performance. Specific details about the 2004 race conditions, such as temperature, wind, and humidity, can be found through meteorological archives or race reports from that year. These details can help explain the race outcomes and the challenges runners faced.
Question 6: What were the qualifying times for the 2004 Boston Marathon?
Qualifying times varied based on age and gender. Specific qualifying standards for the 2004 race can be found on the B.A.A. website archives.
Reviewing these frequently asked questions provides a fundamental understanding of the 2004 Boston Marathon results. Further research can offer a more comprehensive understanding of the race and its historical context.
Additional resources related to the 2004 Boston Marathon, including participant stories, media coverage, and historical analysis, offer further opportunities for exploration.
Tips Derived from the 2004 Boston Marathon Results
Analysis of race results offers valuable training insights applicable to marathon preparation. The following tips, derived from the 2004 Boston Marathon data, provide practical guidance for runners of all levels.
Tip 1: Pacing Strategy is Crucial: Examining the split times of elite runners reveals the importance of a consistent pacing strategy. Avoid starting too fast, which can lead to premature fatigue and hinder performance in later stages. Even pacing allows for optimal energy distribution throughout the 26.2 miles.
Tip 2: Hydration and Fueling are Essential: The 2004 results underscore the importance of proper hydration and fueling. Develop a personalized hydration and nutrition plan based on individual needs and practice it during training runs. Consistent intake of fluids and electrolytes helps maintain performance in demanding conditions.
Tip 3: Training Specificity Matters: Elite runners tailor their training to the specific demands of the Boston course, including its varied terrain and potential weather conditions. Incorporate hill training and practice running in similar weather conditions to prepare adequately. This specificity enhances preparedness for the race’s unique challenges.
Tip 4: Strength Training Enhances Performance: Strength training plays a vital role in injury prevention and overall performance. Incorporating regular strength training exercises helps build muscular endurance and resilience, improving running economy and reducing the risk of injuries common among marathon runners.
Tip 5: Recovery is Equally Important: Post-race recovery is essential for both performance and long-term health. Incorporate adequate rest, proper nutrition, and active recovery strategies like stretching and light exercise into training plans. Prioritizing recovery allows the body to repair and rebuild, promoting optimal adaptation and preventing overtraining.
Tip 6: Mental Fortitude is Key: The Boston Marathon presents significant mental challenges, requiring focus and resilience. Develop mental strategies to manage discomfort and maintain motivation during training and racing. Mental preparation enhances the ability to overcome challenges and persevere through demanding conditions.
Tip 7: Learn from Past Performances: Reviewing past race results, including personal performances and those of other runners, offers valuable insights. Identify areas for improvement, refine training strategies, and set realistic goals based on past performance data. Objective analysis enables informed decision-making and facilitates continuous improvement.
By incorporating these tips into training regimens, runners can enhance performance, reduce the risk of injury, and optimize their preparation for challenging marathons like Boston. These insights, derived from the 2004 results, offer practical guidance applicable to runners of all levels, from aspiring qualifiers to seasoned competitors.
The following conclusion synthesizes the key themes explored throughout this analysis of the 2004 Boston Marathon, offering a final perspective on this historic event and its enduring legacy.
Conclusion
Analysis of the 2004 Boston Marathon results provides a multifaceted understanding of this historic event. Examination of winning times, alongside course records, offers a benchmark for evaluating elite performances. Further exploration of age group winners and participant demographics reveals a broader perspective on the race’s impact, extending beyond the elite field. Consideration of weather conditions and qualifying times adds crucial context, highlighting the influence of external factors on race outcomes. This comprehensive analysis paints a detailed picture of the 2004 race, illuminating the interplay between individual athletic achievement and the broader context surrounding the event. From the strategies employed by elite runners to the perseverance demonstrated by age-group competitors, the 2004 Boston Marathon results encapsulate the essence of competitive running and the enduring human pursuit of excellence.
The 2004 Boston Marathon stands as a testament to human endurance, dedication, and the pursuit of athletic achievement. The results, beyond mere statistics, represent individual stories of triumph, perseverance, and the culmination of years of training. This race, like those before and after it, contributes to the rich tapestry of the Boston Marathon’s enduring legacy, inspiring future generations of runners and solidifying its place as a pinnacle event in the world of distance running. Continued exploration of race data and individual narratives will undoubtedly yield further insights into the complexities of human performance and the enduring appeal of this iconic race.
